KSA99 said:
Thanks for the detailed reply. After reading your reply I got confidence that I can be allowed to enter Canada as I do have all the documentary proof including filling of last year income tax etc. These documentary proof would be more than enough to proof the Canadian Immigration officer that I am a landed immigrant. But I am not sure about my PR status? Is there any official website or other source who can tell me my PR current status?
Further, is there any possibility for me to get PRTD from Canadian embassy directly? If I get PRTD then my return to Canada would be quite smooth and safe. I am confused that while I will be crossing the land boarder the Canadian Immigration officer might refuse me to enter Canada.
It is assumed that my PR status is still valid and it is hoped that I will be allowed to enter Canada, will I be allowed to work for any organizations (Govt. and Privates) and driving license with expired PR status and pending decision on my appeal in IAD?
The facts matter. The facts really make all the difference. The facts that matter are those specific to your individual case.
While participants in this forum can offer estimations based on how certain key factors will generally affect a case, only a professional apprised of the important details can reliably offer advice or a credible opinion about your case in particular. The capacity of your lawyer to ascertain the relevant facts, including especially in the course of
confidential communications with you, is a huge, huge reason why I strongly defer to the lawyer's advice.
Which is to say that your questions would be best answered by your lawyer.
Including, in particular, any questions you have about your current status.
My guess, based on assuming you were issued a 44(1) Report and Removal or Departure Order back in 2014, and that is the subject of the appeal before the IAD, is that you have PR status until there is a formal decision by the IAD. If you win, you keep PR status. If you lose the appeal, your PR status is terminated.
Based on other posts, I also gather that you were issued a one year PR card at some point, but that card too has now expired.
Whether or not you will be granted a PR TD I do not know. My sense is that you are probably entitled to one, based on having made an appeal from within Canada. But I am way, way short of being confident let alone sure of this, particularly if it has been more than a year since you were last in Canada. My guess is that if your lawyer has suggested traveling to Canada via the U.S. and a land crossing, there is probably a good reason for taking that approach.
If your appeal is still pending, you probably have PR status, and thus you will be entitled to enter Canada when you approach a land crossing PoE. Once in Canada, yes you have the same rights and privileges as any other PR, including the right to work. Whether you will be able to find work, I cannot guess. How long will this last, I cannot guess but I would anticipate the appeal process might not take very much longer.
As I previously noted, I do not see much risk involved in traveling via the U.S. if indeed you have status to travel to the U.S.
The more salient risk I perceive is that your appeal is heard sooner rather than later, and you lose the appeal, lose PR status, and will thus need to leave Canada on relatively short notice. That is the risk even if you are granted a PR TD (probably have to be a special PR TD, one issued to specifically facilitate your return to Canada for the appeal, and again I am not at all sure you are eligible let alone entitled to such a PR TD).
Again, I defer to your lawyer.
(Note: Contrary to the proliferation of false and gratuitously insulting accusations otherwise, it is not a common practice among reputable lawyers to take futile cases just for the fees. Lawyers tend to charge excessive fees, yes, indeed, but that is a phenomena across the board these days, from plumbers to dentists, doctors to electricians, and a different story. It may be otherwise for Consultants, including lawfully registered authorized representatives, although ethical standards may be improving among this group as well. In addition to ethical considerations, there are multiple incentives for lawyers to avoid pursuing futile cases outweighing the amount of fees that might be earned.
In contrast, this forum is rife with advice based on way less information than is needed to support that advice. As I said before, and which is worth repeating for emphasis, a lawyer's opinion or advice is way more credible, and reliable, than what is posted in a forum like this. After all, this forum is not even an appropriate venue for giving definitive advice, period -- with due acknowledgement of and apologies for my lapses in this department.)