+1(514) 937-9445 or Toll-free (Canada & US) +1 (888) 947-9445

COPR and coronavirus

crackMBA

Hero Member
Mar 2, 2015
897
377
India
COPR Issued - March 19
COPR Expired - April 23
Raised Webforms - Not able to travel - Before and after COPR expiry
Raised Webform - Ready to travel - June 8
Ghost Update in CIC profile - June 27
Called CIC - July 1 - Medicals Extended to Sept 25. (5 months from COPR)
Visa Office - NDVO
Hi,
Thanks for the information.
Do you see the extended date in your CIC profile or is it still "April 23"?
Also, what is the status of your profile approved or processing?

Thanks
 

BillyWescott

Hero Member
May 24, 2019
287
156
Friend, a hypothetical case, what if we go there, complete the self quarantine and spend another 10 - 15 days to do banking, SIN etc and return after a month if we don't see good prospect to get a job? A fair deal?

IRCC has never guaranteed for 100% extension of COPR and no one knows how much time it would take (what happens if there is second wave of COVID). In such a scenario, we as COPR holders need to play safe within the existing protocol.

Any other views please?
Completely agree. THere is no guarantee.

Please see my last two posts. I called immigration yesterday.

IRCC is clear that softlanding is not allowed at this time. CBSA is aware of this because I also had them on the phone.

No one confirmed that extensions were a guarantee. At no point has IRCC publicly communicated that extensions were a guarantee. Certain folks who have raised webforms have received reassuring emails but these were personal emails, not a global, public statement.
 

wick_sran

Hero Member
Mar 5, 2012
670
310
35
India
NOC Code......
2174
AOR Received.
04-06-2019
IELTS Request
01-02-2019
Completely agree. THere is no guarantee.

Please see my last two posts. I called immigration yesterday.

IRCC is clear that softlanding is not allowed at this time. CBSA is aware of this because I also had them on the phone.

No one confirmed that extensions were a guarantee. At no point has IRCC publicly communicated that extensions were a guarantee. Certain folks who have raised webforms have received reassuring emails but these were personal emails, not a global, public statement.
Those who received reassuring emails would receive extension for sure or not.
 

BillyWescott

Hero Member
May 24, 2019
287
156
***Long Post Alert***
Just so we can decide with eyes open, rather than wishful thinking!
(and most likely my take below is incorrect...)


First - One has all the legal rights to leave the country at will, at any time. No questions. Do we want to be all boastful about it at the POE? Do we want to challenge the border officer? Or... that is the point of my comments below.

Not a lawyer and I think your reference here is perhaps to the letter of the rule. A border officer or immigration authorities may or may not be fully satisfied. And if one is unhappy, surely you can appeal the decision etc.

Will you want to do that? Risk it? Will one be able to?..those are the considerations we must mull over deeply, before even suggesting such a course of soft landing, in these times where Canada (like every country) is spending billions of dollars to minimize COVID 19.

Coming back to the letter or rule noticed the specific section of current responses to CoPR extension request

@CitImmCanada (IRCC)
1/4 Hi. We are currently reviewing requests from clients who are out of the country and have received a valid CoPR or who have an expired CoPR who are now ready to move to Canada permanently. We expect that next steps will be provided in the next few weeks.
2/4 Please wait to receive confirmation from IRCC that your CoPR has been extended and that you are now able to travel with documents the department will identify.

3/4 Please note that only those ready to live and settle in Canada and able to quarantine for 14 days immediately upon arrival will be allowed to travel to the country.

4/4 Travel for temporary stay, including strictly to finalize an application, will not be permitted at this time.




And then there is the rule book - I agree the examples below do not include CoPR confirmation. Is CoPR driven landing optional at this time? Could we seek extension of CoPR? Has Canada offered not to penalise for not traveling at this time (as of today 7 July 2020)?:)

As per the travel exemptions page of the IRCC's website, essential travel is defined as "travel for reasons that are non-discretionary and non-optional. The emergency orders under the Quarantine Act do not allow people to travel to Canada for optional or discretionary reasons, such as for tourism, recreation or entertainment."


So yes you are correct, there is interpretation and subjective conclusion, which remains in the eyes of the beholder! :) You and I in our vested interest would like to read the below as "My landing and confirmation of PR is essential". Let us remember the Officer at the border has the same subjective space to conclude if we a traveler is only landing and intends to return back after the temporary 14d quarantine - while the CoPR could have been extended, Canadian Govt has repeatedly written in thousands of letters that your application will not be denied due to your inability to travel - then it is NON-Essential.

Personally I truly dearly wish, the officer sees it differently, but if not
a) can't see a fault with that officer's decision
b) even if I did - what are my recourses? Appeal to IRCC? From where - once I am back in home country? Or sue them from overseas?


Well all of those options are fairly given by one of the FAIREST countries in the world - Canada. So yes - you could do that.

Equally some might decide to be safe, understand the spirit of the rule, comprehend why CBSA has asked you not even to flagpole.

Where even flagpoling is deemed risky and discouraged
  • these are people living in Canada, safer that India or many other countries,
  • with far better medical facilities).
  • And still - CBSA is trying to protect, minimise and serve the larger greater good!
So .. the decision and beliefs are entirely our own. But we Canadians like to be respectful - no wonder we say sorry even when someone else has erred). :)

Wish every single person here the very best of wise, decision making!
(and if you read this far - you are a brave one, thank you!)
Here's my argument that softlandings are essential travel for people with CoPR issued prior to March 18 and who are able to do a softlanding.

1. One can travel if CoPR was issued prior to March 18 (exempt of travel ban) AND they travel is essential.
2. Esssential travel is defined as "travel for reasons that are non-discretionary and non-optional. The emergency orders under the Quarantine Act do not allow people to travel to Canada for optional or discretionary reasons, such as for tourism, recreation or entertainment".
2. Softlandings are not encouraged but they are not prohibited either since you have the right to move freely.
2. Nowhere do they explicitly and publicly state that softlandings are non-essential travel, except the tweets of IRCC of July 3 which imply that it is non-essential. Not sure what the legal value of tweets is.. who knows if the people who post on behalf of IRCC have the authority to bind the whole IRCC through the posts.
3. Argument that softlandings are non-essential travels is contradicted by the fact that extensions are not guaranteed (especially for those living in countries with no travel ban in place and with regular flights to Canada).
4. Therefore: one would HAVE TO travel and activate their PR before the deadline if they don't want to lose their rights = not optional and not discretionary reason, and clearly not for recreation tourism or entertainment.

It would be completely different if there was a public statement or a global email containing updated guidelines that explicitly state that softlandings are prohibited or are considered as non-essential.

I don't know how anyone can challenge that logic but if you can, please respond.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dashing_warrior

whyCorona

Champion Member
Mar 17, 2020
1,016
994
Here's my argument that softlandings are essential travel for people with CoPR issued prior to March 18 and who are able to do a softlanding.

1. One can travel if CoPR was issued prior to March 18 (exempt of travel ban) AND they travel is essential.
2. Esssential travel is defined as "travel for reasons that are non-discretionary and non-optional. The emergency orders under the Quarantine Act do not allow people to travel to Canada for optional or discretionary reasons, such as for tourism, recreation or entertainment".
2. Softlandings are not encouraged but they are not prohibited either since you have the right to move freely.
2. Nowhere do they explicitly and publicly state that softlandings are non-essential travel, except the tweets of IRCC of July 3 which imply that it is non-essential. Not sure what the legal value of tweets is.. who knows if the people who post on behalf of IRCC have the authority to bind the whole IRCC through the posts.
3. Argument that softlandings are non-essential travels is contradicted by the fact that extensions are not guaranteed (especially for those living in countries with no travel ban in place and with regular flights to Canada).
4. Therefore: one would HAVE TO travel and activate their PR before the deadline if they don't want to lose their rights = not optional and not discretionary reason, and clearly not for recreation tourism or entertainment.

It would be completely different if there was a public statement or a global email containing updated guidelines that explicitly state that softlandings are prohibited or are considered as non-essential.

I don't know how anyone can challenge that logic but if you can, please respond.
Let me overthink and add one more fact. What if there are delays in issuing PR cards? How many people got the actual PR card after March 2020? There is a lot of risk involved as things are not working as they used to be. You should not only think of doing landing for paper work but should also consider getting a PR card in hand. If for some reason there are delays in getting the PR card then you can argue with IRCC better in Canada than doing it from outside Canada after doing your soft landing procedure. We should do what is being instructed by IRCC no matter if it is their twitter handle as this is not the time for arguing over things to make them favourable from your perspective.
 

13nitinsharma

Champion Member
Apr 17, 2012
2,568
3,163
Canada
Shouldn't we wait for travel restrictions to be lifted or resumption of commercial flights?
It's really confusing when should we raise web form for ready to travel.
How about mentioning in web form that apart from the above two barriers no other hurdle in travelling?
You should do it now and mention in your web form that -

Air India has resumed evacuation flights operated under the Vande Bharat Mission from India to Canada from June onward. Thus, I am writing to inform that we are now interested in travelling to Canada. We request you to please consider our request to provide extension on our expired COPR and PRV documents. Please advise us on the next steps to follow.
 

kanugln3

Star Member
Apr 11, 2020
59
57
You should do it now and mention in your web form that -

Air India has resumed evacuation flights operated under the Vande Bharat Mission from India to Canada from June onward. Thus, I am writing to inform that we are now interested in travelling to Canada. We request you to please consider our request to provide extension on our expired COPR and PRV documents. Please advise us on the next steps to follow.
I completely agree, I believe every one from India should send a ready to travel webform.
 

SithLord

VIP Member
Aug 18, 2017
6,873
5,135
I checked with Lufthansa this is the reply I got if people with COPR from India can travel or not.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Thank you for your email.

Green card / Permanent Residents / Work permit holders for the USA / Canada are not allowed on the flights operating as repatriation flights.

Please note that at the moment we have permission to transport US/Canada passport holders.

INDIAN Nationals holding US green cards or Canadian Permanent Residence status are only permitted on this special repatriation flight if he/she is a spouse of US/Canadian National.

You are requested to carry a spouse passport copy as a proof of he/she being the spouse.

If you don’t fulfil one of the above criteria, you will not be eligible to travel on the Repatriation Flights.
Right so I need to get married to a Canadian/US national in the next few days to be eligible to fly in one of these flights lol
 

BillyWescott

Hero Member
May 24, 2019
287
156
Let me overthink and add one more fact. What if there are delays in issuing PR cards? How many people got the actual PR card after March 2020? There is a lot of risk involved as things are not working as they used to be. You should not only think of doing landing for paper work but should also consider getting a PR card in hand. If for some reason there are delays in getting the PR card then you can argue with IRCC better in Canada than doing it from outside Canada after doing your soft landing procedure. We should do what is being instructed by IRCC no matter if it is their twitter handle as this is not the time for arguing over things to make them favourable from your perspective.
If they don't issue the PR card you can contact the embassy to get a travel document.

I'm not saying we shouldn't do as instructed, but the instructions are confusing contradictory and laconic.
 

whyCorona

Champion Member
Mar 17, 2020
1,016
994
Right so I need to get married to a Canadian/US national in the next few days to be eligible to fly in one of these flights lol
hahah this is expected from them. These are Repatriation flights are only operating to evacuate foreign nationals, Canadian Citizens and PR holders. They might not even know what CoPR stands for lol. VB flights are also Repatriation flights for evacuating Indians from abroad but they are making money by allowing to onboard people from India to make money both ways.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SithLord