I don't understand your interpretation of the NOBTS1 email guys
@crackMBA @butterflyins
From my understanding, the email says you will only be back to square one if you don't respond.
But if you respond, by choosing either option, then your application remains open.
If you choose option A they'll give you an AL and you must be ready to go at short notice.
If you choose option B you'll get a new COPR with a long (up to one year) validity period.
Do you disagree?
In terms of potential issues, I'm wondering:
1. What happens if your first COPR was issued pre-March 18. If you opt for option B and get a new COPR, do you still qualify as a pre-March 18 candidate exempted from the travel restrictions? Or do you now qualify as a post-March 18 COPR holder subjected to travel restrictions?
2. If you select option B and become subject to travel restrictions (i.e. u cannot travel to Canada even tho u got a valid COPR), will u need an AL on top of the new COPR? If so, option B is of no help. Unless they lift the restrictions this summer.
3. It seems that option B is better in terms of timeline, i.e. people have long term visibility and organize better. Is this option more risky than option !? Why?
4. Do you guys think soft landings will be permitted again upon lifting of the travel restrictions?
5. Is this new procedure applied by IRCC world wide, or only in certain VOs like ND? I depend on the Paris VO and so far I haven't heard of anything here.