+1(514) 937-9445 or Toll-free (Canada & US) +1 (888) 947-9445
See that is what I was thinking! I don't think they can impose marriage on people can they?

This is why I feel confused because there must be a way for me to sponsor since I can't get the long term stay for his country and he can't get the tourists visa for Canada

If you actually require $60K in liquid funds to be able to stay in his country for a year, you *may* have a chance at conjugal. That is a fairly extreme requirement, so IRCC *may* accept it as an immigration barrier. However, they just as easily may not.
 
If you actually require $60K in liquid funds to be able to stay in his country for a year, you *may* have a chance at conjugal. That is a fairly extreme requirement, so IRCC *may* accept it as an immigration barrier. However, they just as easily may not.


I just saw on another website it says you need to prove you'll have an income of approx $2500/month US if you plan to stay long term

But I have to quit my job to move there lol so it's like catch 22 either way the scenario is not working out. Anyway we'll see what happens I guess
 
I just saw on another website it says you need to prove you'll have an income of approx $2500/month US if you plan to stay long term

But I have to quit my job to move there lol so it's like catch 22 either way the scenario is not working out. Anyway we'll see what happens I guess

Having to quit your job is not a legal or immigration barrier. The funds requirement could be an immigration barrier, if true. I suggest you do some research about it instead of just looking on "another website".
 
Yes I get the whole can't use your job as a barrier thing

putting that aside what Im saying is that their government requires a $2500 US monthly income in order to meet the prerequisite for long term stay visa which is an income I won't have since I would have to be quitting my job here to go there technically speaking

So again catch 22 lol
 
See that is what I was thinking! I don't think they can impose marriage on people can they?

This is why I feel confused because there must be a way for me to sponsor since I can't get the long term stay for his country and he can't get the tourists visa for Canada
IRCC cannot force someone to marry in order to sponsor someone. I guess the gray area is about HOW the couple will become common-law partners? Will IRCC challenge the fact that the Canadian didnt move to their partners country to become common-law? Check out the link below and draw your own conclusion as I aint no immigration lawyer lol

https://www.canada.ca/en/immigratio...family-class-determining-spouse/legality.html

Requirement to be married before submitting the application
IRCC cannot require couples to marry in order to immigrate. However, if they are not married, they must be common-law partners. There is no provision in IRPA for fiancé(e)s or intended common-law partners. The expectation is that a Canadian or permanent resident and a foreign national will get married or live together and establish a common-law relationship before they submit sponsorship and immigration applications.
 
IRCC cannot force someone to marry in order to sponsor someone. I guess the gray area is about HOW the couple will become common-law partners? Will IRCC challenge the fact that the Canadian didnt move to their partners country to become common-law? Check out the link below and draw your own conclusion as I aint no immigration lawyer lol

https://www.canada.ca/en/immigratio...family-class-determining-spouse/legality.html

Requirement to be married before submitting the application
IRCC cannot require couples to marry in order to immigrate. However, if they are not married, they must be common-law partners. There is no provision in IRPA for fiancé(e)s or intended common-law partners. The expectation is that a Canadian or permanent resident and a foreign national will get married or live together and establish a common-law relationship before they submit sponsorship and immigration applications.

The issue is that IRCC wants to ensure that only spouses or people in spouse-like relationships are given PR. They don't want to give PR to someone's girl/boy friend when the two people may not be that serious about their relationship - they may date for a few months and then break up, for example. That's fine in general, but you shouldn't get PR on the basis of such a relationship.

If two people are legally married, and the marriage is genuine (i.e not done just to get PR), then it's a clear indication that they are serious about their relationship. Sure, they may get divorced later, even perhaps a few months after immigrating, but at the time of applying, they are in a serious committed relationship.

If you aren't married, they want you to prove that you are essentially married in all but name. Does the world see you as married - do you share finances, live together, etc. That's why the burden of proof is higher for common-law spouses.

If you want to be married/common-law but it is impossible to do so because of a legal/immigration bar, they have the option for a conjugal sponsorship. However, they really will ask many questions to make sure you are in fact that serious about the relationship. That's why a recent relationship, or something where you can't really prove that the two of you want to build a life together, will be questioned. The burden of proof is even higher for conjugal relationships, unless there's a very obvious reason why you cannot show such proof (death penalty for same sex couples? you probably don't have many social media posts..)
 
Last edited: