+1(514) 937-9445 or Toll-free (Canada & US) +1 (888) 947-9445
I sent am email to them and they sent me a generic email . Then the AF person sent me that as well .
[/QUOTE]

You shared this link before deleting it:
https://www.zupimages.net/viewer.php?id=20/40/njct.jpg

I have a few questions if you allow:

-How did you contact them, through the generic feedback form (Accessible here:
https://secure.cic.gc.ca/feedback-retroaction/feedback-retroaction-eng.aspx ), or by a specific email address?

- The capture you shared is signed '' IRCC Calgary '', it's curious, I didn't know that IRCC answered according to the sections ... I already interacted with them, they never specify the center or they are found.

-Last point, the fact that the person in an email supposed to be formal speaks of '' hope '' makes me very perplexed ...

Can you tell us more? More details ?

Thank you.

, Piotr.
 
I sent am email to them and they sent me a generic email . Then the AF person sent me that as well .

You shared this link before deleting it:
https://www.zupimages.net/viewer.php?id=20/40/njct.jpg

I have a few questions if you allow:

-How did you contact them, through the generic feedback form (Accessible here:
https://secure.cic.gc.ca/feedback-retroaction/feedback-retroaction-eng.aspx ), or by a specific email address?

- The capture you shared is signed '' IRCC Calgary '', it's curious, I didn't know that IRCC answered according to the sections ... I already interacted with them, they never specify the center or they are found.

-Last point, the fact that the person in an email supposed to be formal speaks of '' hope '' makes me very perplexed ...

Can you tell us more? More details ?

Thank you.

, Piotr.
[/QUOTE]
I had been called for a test before covid so I sent a message for update . That was wat i got . Message was to cic calgary
 
You do not answer the question of how you contacted them. By form or otherwise, and how.

The screen of the official IRCC email supos - which you were quick to delete - seems doubtful (Thanks to my browser history) ... + Your profile here is very recent, and you have only published here , in this thread exclusively ...

Sorry, but I remain very suspicious ... Until proven otherwise, it's a rumor.

(This is especially the element that the one who sent the email and is supposed to be IRCC used the word '' hope '' that makes me suspicious).

We must continue to make noise, friends, nothing has changed.

, Piotr.
 
You do not answer the question of how you contacted them. By form or otherwise, and how.

The screen of the official IRCC email supos - which you were quick to delete - seems doubtful (Thanks to my browser history) ... + Your profile here is very recent, and you have only published here , in this thread exclusively ...

Sorry, but I remain very suspicious ... Until proven otherwise, it's a rumor.

(This is especially the element that the one who sent the email and is supposed to be IRCC used the word '' hope '' that makes me suspicious).

We must continue to make noise, friends, nothing has changed.

, Piotr.
Yeah I suspect too, but in this case want to be proven wrong and hopefully online tests start
 
Yeah I suspect too, but in this case want to be proven wrong and hopefully online tests start


Hope is not enough unfortunately, we must act.

Otherwise, I think I have found the main way of virtual gathering of spousal sponsors to organize their multiple sittings, on a social network (I cannot quote it here, oddly, the moderators here systematically remove any reference to this famous social network). .. I'm still collecting the informations.

I will posting a detailed report here very soon, as soon as I have time. It will be very informative, and give us concrete ideas.
 
  • Like
Reactions: vegasIndian
« Thought » not ´thot’ brother.

I « hope » the email you shared is real

,you don't have to believe me
« Thought » not ´thot’ brother.

I « hope » the email you shared is real .
May be you make-up stories so you find it hard to believe people . Ignore if you think what was shared would not benefit you instead of trying to rubbish people you don't know .
 
May be you make-up stories so you find it hard to believe people . Ignore if you think what was shared would not benefit you instead of trying to rubbish people you don't know .
Improve your writing and learn to accept criticism so you can improve.

lets hope what you shared is true.
 
Improve your writing and learn to accept criticism so you can improve.

lets hope what you shared is true.
Let's not lets ;)
 
Great news!

let's keep criticism at bay
;)
 
You shared this link before deleting it:
https://www.zupimages.net/viewer.php?id=20/40/njct.jpg

I have a few questions if you allow:

-How did you contact them, through the generic feedback form (Accessible here:
https://secure.cic.gc.ca/feedback-retroaction/feedback-retroaction-eng.aspx ), or by a specific email address?

- The capture you shared is signed '' IRCC Calgary '', it's curious, I didn't know that IRCC answered according to the sections ... I already interacted with them, they never specify the center or they are found.

-Last point, the fact that the person in an email supposed to be formal speaks of '' hope '' makes me very perplexed ...

Can you tell us more? More details ?

Thank you.

, Piotr.
I had been called for a test before covid so I sent a message for update . That was wat i got . Message was to cic calgary
[/QUOTE]

How can they possibly "resume" online tests, if online tests have never been done in the first place? Looks like a hoax to me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ott-613
Do you mind posting the screenshot of email including the "from" address?

In addition to that, the screenshot mentioned: ´resume online testing ‘ .. which means it started somewhere and then stopped!?? We know there was no online testing at all, There IS ‘re-testing’ and it is in person only.