As Screech mentioned, they could return to AB, live there for 6 months during recovery and by doing so, not commit healthcare fraud at all. This would be perfectly legal.Lux et Veritas said:1. Your scenario 1 is healthcare fraud and having known so many people who work both in Service Ontario and hospitals the fraud detection rates are actually quite high. Plus even if they are temporarily resident they will still have to wait months for the heart by-pass surgery, during which they will need to finance themselves. It's not like they come monday and the surgery is on tuesday.
Also, I have seen cases where emergency surgery has been scheduled within 12 hours of the patient being diagnosed. Just because you haven't seen it doesn't mean it doesn't happen.
You have a horrible habit of letting your imagination run wild where you envision parents coming back to Canada, working , etc. Why can't the parents continue to work overseas to finance the kids' educations?Lux et Veritas said:2. Once again you don't get it: if the children come for schooling/university they'll stay here for years, and children can't finance themselves they need their families (at least 1 parent) to come back and support them. This parent will either need a job or is rich enough not to care about leeching off some Pakistani bigot on this forum.
So your point is that becuase it has already happened, it can never happen again? "These people" as you refer to them volutarily left canada to move to a war zone, and didn't even think about canada until they needed something. Once they got what the needed, they happily returned to their war zone and will likely not think about Canada until they need to be saved again.Lux et Veritas said:3. Scenario 3 only happened once in 2006, and there's a simple solution to it: don't make it the responsibility of the state to evacuate people. Since these people knew that Lebanon is already a war zone they went back knowing the risk. That's not such a big deal and other developed countries do that as well.
This cost taxpayers over $90 million. Imagine if those funds could have been used towards schools, hospitals, etc. to improve the lives of Canadians. Wouldn't that have been a better use of the money?
So, you accuse me of being bigot because I disagree with you. But the fact that you disagree with me equally vehemently makes you equally bigoted. Yes another example of you being a hypocrite.Lux et Veritas said:1 and 2 simply don't apply and 3 is hardly the biggest issue in the world. But to bigots like you they are the be-all and end-all.