Citizenship Applications Delivered: October 16-20, 2017 (C6)

[salimnw]

I had that status since Nov 3rd but no AOR received as of yet.

Can you please make a call to IRCC and verify, I think that may help.

 

[kilamans]

Went 'In Process' on November 30. Can someone please update spreadsheet? Thanks!! Line 164. ID: rmash.

Where are you checking this update, could you please share the link and how to check it?

 

[smah1986]

Can you please make a call to IRCC and verify, I think that may help.

I did spoke to them but they gave me not so good reply.
Agent said they can confirm they have received my application on Oct 13/17 but not have not started working on my application. If I want status I should write a letter to CPC Sydney - which I will not. I will wait and see what happens in next couple of weeks, as it will be 2 months for me.

 

[rmash]

Where are you checking this update, could you please share the link and how to check it?

https://services3.cic.gc.ca/ecas/security.do

 

[curious_123]

can u please tell me what is the fastest way to reach an agent while calling cic? I want to avoid automated messages

 

[Quebecoise]

Hi,
Just got my AOR!
Please update my status.. Line 608...

 

[Tah]

Got AOR Today, app was delivered oct 20, please update .

Thanks

 

[feb07]

Hi,
Please add my information to the spreadsheet. Thank you so much!

Location: Brampton , Ontario
App type: Single
delivered (Confirmed): Oct 19/2017
AOR: Nov.30/2017

 

[Zuscheema]

Hi folks!!!! any October 19th delivered still waiting????

 

[lpc19800]

Hi folks!!!! any October 19th delivered still waiting????

Imma leave this here: https://www.canadavisa.com/canada-immigration-discussion-board/threads/lpcs-guide-to-october-2017-applicants-for-staying-sane.531269/

 

[salimnw]

From the google sheet it looks like they are randomly now working on applications received between Oct 19th to Oct 25th coz I see a lot of people within that range getting AORs for last few days. I believe the IRCC document verification staff are working rigorously to catch up as fast as they can as Christmas is coming and trying to clear the over-load. That should definitely be a good news for all of us. We just need to chill and keep calm and pray to Lord.
Have a good weekend everyone.
Good-luck to all Oct applicants.

 

[curious_123]

just got off phone from cic... a very nice lady picked up the phone.. she told she is not sure whats going on with my application as its not on the system... i was told to wait for couple of weeks.... i asked if i should reapply... she answered "NO" ..she said to give 2-3 more weeks to check if the application get returned or not..if not she asked me to call back in few weeks...
October 16th :NO AOR yet

 

[jatinder751]

Hello Guys,

A bit of confusion here. I worked at a place and the place was sold later on. It was a husky gas station and with a convenienece store with a personal name and when it got sold the next guy changed the name of the store but it still had husky gas station.
In my application under employemnt history should I just put Husky gas station... would that be okay or it may cause trouble of during interview or something I disclose it to them?

Please advice.

Thanks

 

[razerblade]

Hello Guys,

A bit of confusion here. I worked at a place and the place was sold later on. It was a husky gas station and with a convenienece store with a personal name and when it got sold the next guy changed the name of the store but it still had husky gas station.
In my application under employemnt history should I just put Husky gas station... would that be okay or it may cause trouble of during interview or something I disclose it to them?

Please advice.

Thanks

Why not put both ?

DATEA to DATEB old name
DATEB to DATEC new name

 

[jatinder751]

Its just the name of the convenience store they changed.
What I was thinking was Date a- date b under 1st manager.
date c- date D - Second manage.
And provide the same address and just Husky as the employer name. If they ask I can explain the management changed.

They wouldnt make much fuss about the covenience part would they?