ButterflyChemist said:
In all fairness it seems like you are the one who doesn't get it. CIC set there language requirements and these must be met, so in this case there is no such thing as "poor language skills"
A PGWP job is "less valid" as you put it because a PGWP is an open permit and so a PGWP holder can take ANY job, it does not have to be in any particular NOC category.
In the past there was abuse of the LMIA (LMO) system, however, those brought in on LMIAs have to be paid at similar levels as Canadians and PR according to the LMIA and an employer who breaches that is penalised if this is brought to the notice of appropriate agencies.
You should know how difficult it is to get an LMIA ( you stated that this is the reason your employer can't get meet the requirements to get you one) yet you devalue its importance to those who have gone through the trouble and expense to get one.
I don't know what you mean by crappy jobs but since EE is applicable to CEC, FSW and FST then it stands to reason that people with "crappy jobs " as you term it would not qualify.
As it relates to your point about skill, you should know that an ITA does not equal PR. The application will be processed under the rules of the applicable program and every criteria will be assessed.
You really need to take a step back and look at the big picture because it seems that your fundamental understanding of how this is supposed to work is a bit flawed.
You are right. My stress over this new system has clearly made me view it in the wrong way.
but not totally wrong.
btw, it's not that my employer "can't meet" the requirements. you probably didn't read it but how can a company that hired me for having better qualification than local people come up with a reason for "not being able to find suitable local people for the position"?
Don't get it wrong. my employer is a fairly big company and trying its best to support me in every way possible.
now onto my next point.
Yes, EE is a ranking system not immigration system.
but because of the way that it's unfairly evaluating people, people who are more qualified to receive ITA haven't gotten it yet.
"poor" language skills might have been a bit too extreme but let me put it this way.
people who barely met the minimum score on IELTS and have held LMOs since before the system change got ITAs. you think it's fair then?
PGWP holders can work for any position, true, but that's what NOC category is for.
This new ranking system should not discriminate PGWP holders working in the appropriate NOC category just because they have PGWP.
Think about it this way, the way that this new system is evaluating people right now doesn't consider the important categories and it results in a lot of people who are probably way more qualified to receive an ITA than others not receiving it at all because they haven't been given a chance to show what they got.(like you said, this doesn't happen until after you receive ITA and apply for PR. but what's the point if the ranking system is unfairly leaving out a lot of suitable candidates over others?)
I don't care and I don't wanna whine about what happens after receiving ITA.
All I'm saying is that the ranking system needs to take more things into consideration because the way it is right now, a lot of otherwise more qualified candidates are left out waiting for ITA helplessly.