I would have to disagree. Unless you are going to provide some pretty compelling evidence (which I would wonder why it wouldn't have been included in the the original application), the appeal is a better route. You will have the opportunity to address their concerns directly and overcome them. If you refile, you risk the application being denied on the grounds that the case was already decided (res judicia?).justina said:Our situation was a little different, as we were inland. However, we met online and married |(eloped) 2 1/2 months later. I am a little older, and we are different races. Our application took 23 months to process, but we submitted additional evidence to prove our relationship was ongoing, and known about and accepted by friends and family.
I would advise you to refile your application and include as much proof as possible that you have a real relationship. CIC does not accept videos, and many have been told that a child is not proof of a real relationship.
Notarized letters from people who know you, about your relationship, etc are good. Facebook screenprints, copies of cards you have sent each other, emails, photos, plane tickets, receipts for gifts, etc are all good to use for proof.
An outland application can be appealed but this is a long and painful process. Check some of the threads for information from those who have been denied and appealed.
Locolynn