Background:
CBSA seems to be upset that they have been offering rapid and timely service for PRs.
They have created an unpublished and secretive "flagpole" policy because they think they're too busy providing this service. It can be found here: http://jrlawoffice.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/FINAL_Factsheet_Flagpoling_eng.pdf
The Canadian Bar Association's position about "flagpoling" can be found here: http://www.cba.org/CMSPages/GetFile.aspx?guid=a952f4e6-bb15-40a8-8b10-72a7f5303da9
This tactic by CBSA of reducing PR services by over 70% may spread to other land border crossings.
Basically, the Bar Association considers CBSA's actions to be illegal. PRs (and study/work permits) must be validated at border points of entry by law. It doesn't matter how long you've left Canada. Flagpoling is a made-up term by CBSA without any meaning. CBSA is making things up, and not even defining them.
My spouse was refused PR processing at the Queenston-Lewiston crossing, even though we spent 24 hours in the USA. Shopping was the primary purpose of the trip.
I've sent the complaint below to every senior CIC staffer I could construct an email address for.
The Associate Deputy Minister of Immigration, Richard Wex, referred our case the next day to CIC's Case Management Branch. The Case Management Branch "Reviews and manages contentious, complex, high profile and sensitive immigration cases" (http://www.cba.org/cba/cle/PDF/IMM11_Chomyn_Slides.pdf)
They even responded at 5:15PM Eastern, after regular working hours in Ottawa.
Evidently, the Immigration ADM is taking CBSA's refusals very seriously.
Here is what we emailed to CIC that generated a very quick response:
CBSA seems to be upset that they have been offering rapid and timely service for PRs.
They have created an unpublished and secretive "flagpole" policy because they think they're too busy providing this service. It can be found here: http://jrlawoffice.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/FINAL_Factsheet_Flagpoling_eng.pdf
The Canadian Bar Association's position about "flagpoling" can be found here: http://www.cba.org/CMSPages/GetFile.aspx?guid=a952f4e6-bb15-40a8-8b10-72a7f5303da9
This tactic by CBSA of reducing PR services by over 70% may spread to other land border crossings.
Basically, the Bar Association considers CBSA's actions to be illegal. PRs (and study/work permits) must be validated at border points of entry by law. It doesn't matter how long you've left Canada. Flagpoling is a made-up term by CBSA without any meaning. CBSA is making things up, and not even defining them.
My spouse was refused PR processing at the Queenston-Lewiston crossing, even though we spent 24 hours in the USA. Shopping was the primary purpose of the trip.
I've sent the complaint below to every senior CIC staffer I could construct an email address for.
The Associate Deputy Minister of Immigration, Richard Wex, referred our case the next day to CIC's Case Management Branch. The Case Management Branch "Reviews and manages contentious, complex, high profile and sensitive immigration cases" (http://www.cba.org/cba/cle/PDF/IMM11_Chomyn_Slides.pdf)
They even responded at 5:15PM Eastern, after regular working hours in Ottawa.
Evidently, the Immigration ADM is taking CBSA's refusals very seriously.
Here is what we emailed to CIC that generated a very quick response:
Finally, I've gotten in contact with the Immigration critics from the other major political parties and the border cities that CBSA's "policies" will impact.Hello,
I was shocked to find that my wife was refused PR processing at the Queenston-Lewiston Bridge this weekend after a 24 hour trip to the USA.
Along with the Confirmation of Permanent Residency, the Canadian Embassy in [redacted] letter clearly stated that it can be activated at any Port of Entry.
The CBSA experience at [ redacted ] PM on December [redacted] was frustrating. At a nearly empty office (4 desk agents and only 2 clients inside), we were told they no longer process such applications Friday through Monday because of "workload".
The CBSA website clearly states that this crossing offers Immigration Services 24 hours per day, 7 days per week.
All we were provided was an English-only 'factsheet' about a new policy on "Flagpoling", which does not define what this term even means. We've never raised a flag in our lives, therefore we are not flagpolers.
We were told by CBSA that there is zero chance they can process us at that time. "They can't".
How are Canadians supposed to immigrate efficiently when every step of the process is fraught with delays? While family class applications are being streamlined, the next step of the process gets delayed.
1. Why does CIC continue to advise PR applicants to go to any port of entry when Ports of Entry will reject them?
2. Why does CBSA make up words and rules and not define/publish them? Covfefe.
3. What is the basis in law for CBSA's refusals to process PR landings?
This cannot be allowed to continue.
Thank you for your attention in this matter,
Last edited: