The problem will be that if they get in with a majority, they are likely to be even harder on immigration (and other things).fariza said:Yes the public opinion survey still shows in favor of Conservatives... So very likely no twist eminent!!!
The problem will be that if they get in with a majority, they are likely to be even harder on immigration (and other things).fariza said:Yes the public opinion survey still shows in favor of Conservatives... So very likely no twist eminent!!!
Baloo said:You are likely to be disappointed after the election; Because of the way the Canadian voting system works at this time, you are likely to see the same government back in power.
Immigration will get tougher in future.
fariza said:Yes the public opinion survey still shows in favor of Conservatives... So very likely no twist eminent!!!
Well public opinion doesn't reflects in toppling a federal govt as its not the public but the opposition MP's usually responsible in doing that... led by the politics in upper shelf (house of commons)... Public votes to elect MP's... Majority lead one party to form Government but as Harper Govt had been a minority govt... there was every chance to get toppled by the liberals and their coalition and that's exactly happened.....Fourth Election in last 7 years!!! But if there is fresh election Conservatives have still chance to regain their power.......pranx125 said:could you give me the link to the public opinion (Poll) survey.
How come, the government just toppled a couple of days ago and you come out with a news that the public opinion survey is in favour of the Conservatives?????????????. STRANGE............................
Well so far I know thats the common way of doing opinion survey to predict peoples choice of to be vote (popularity/performance)... it may not reflect the ultimate outcome always and might get changed over time as the poll time closely approaches... given the commitment of one leader or by the running debate on some issues opponents raised to the public.... and after all these some major twist/ shift might occur overnight at the very end like what happened in US during J W BUSH second regime!! Anyways its too early to comment or predict... We are not much into the nitty gitty of Can politics but just hope it goes well for the greater interest of all of us....pranx125 said:Thanks for the links Fariza,
But This ain't a Poll survey, this is just a popularity or performance survey. The balance could tilt in favour of the opponents when the general public go in for voting.
various factors could influence the voters.
anyway the online survey conducted by the private agency does not necessarily reflect the real out come of the election results.
1. Lowering the points was not a crime. The Govt. should put in more staff and speed up clearing the cases.PMM said:Hi
I am afraid you don't understand the politics in Canada.
1. It was the Liberal Gov't who lowered the points from 75 to 67 as an election ploy, creating the massive backlog we see today.
2. There were more immigrants "landed" in the past year than in the past 30 years.
3. Go back to the old system? Then if you don't mind waiting 10/15 years for your application to get to the top of pile.
4. Remember Immigration is for CANADAS benefit, not the applicant.
Well said Pb55, I completely agree with you!pb55 said:Sorry beg to differ with your goodself Sir PMM.
1. It was the Liberal Gov't who lowered the points from 75 to 67 as an election ploy, creating the massive backlog we see today.
Backlog was not created because of lowering of points. Backlog was created because the politicians did not use common sense to close the intake of fresh applications when they had sufficient applicants at hand to process.
2. There were more immigrants "landed" in the past year than in the past 30 years
Agreed. But after queue-jumping. What a shame.
3. Go back to the old system? Then if you don't mind waiting 10/15 years for your application to get to the top of pile.
No. Do not go back to the old system. No one is asking for that. Just to be treated fairly on first come first serve basis as promised. It is unfair for people to wait for 7/8 years when others (post feb 2008) are getting visas in 7/8 months.
4. Remember Immigration is for CANADAS benefit, not the applicant.
Agreed. But being fair is or should be hallmark of any developed country.
Well said pb55. Sorry I have expressed my concern a little bit loudly, but I am right. PMM is not worried because he has not applied under the old system and he is not in trouble because of foolish policies of CIC.pb55 said:Sorry beg to differ with your goodself Sir PMM.
1. It was the Liberal Gov't who lowered the points from 75 to 67 as an election ploy, creating the massive backlog we see today.
Backlog was not created because of lowering of points. Backlog was created because the politicians did not use common sense to close the intake of fresh applications when they had sufficient applicants at hand to process.
2. There were more immigrants "landed" in the past year than in the past 30 years
Agreed. But after queue-jumping. What a shame.
3. Go back to the old system? Then if you don't mind waiting 10/15 years for your application to get to the top of pile.
No. Do not go back to the old system. No one is asking for that. Just to be treated fairly on first come first serve basis as promised. It is unfair for people to wait for 7/8 years when others (post feb 2008) are getting visas in 7/8 months.
4. Remember Immigration is for CANADAS benefit, not the applicant.
Agreed. But being fair is or should be hallmark of any developed country.