If you read the previous discussions, including observations posted by the participant who personally knows multiple individuals who lost PR status after moving to another province, you should clearly see that Charter mobility rights are NOT implicated.
The move to another province is NOT grounds to revoke status. And it is very unlikely this happens.
But a move to another province, particularly a move rather soon, can TRIGGER an inquiry into whether the sponsored PR status was obtained by fraud . . . involving a misrepresentation by the PR himself or herself, or by someone involved in process like a personal sponsor or an employer providing information.
Technically a misrepresentation as to intention may be the misrepresentation which supports a decision to revoke PR status, and a move to another province soon after landing might be considered evidence indicating there was a lack of the represented intent to settle in the province. My sense is this is NOT a usual case. My sense is that IRCC will ordinarily focus on cases in which particular false facts can be identified (such as an employer's letter containing untruthful information, which appears to be one of the more common types of fraud, where a former employer affirms the PR-applicant has employment experience the individual did not really have . . . oft times this is about the position and duties of that position, in order to meet experience requirements). However, if IRCC is provided direct evidence of the individual actually making arrangements to take employment or otherwise planning a move to another province prior to the date the PR lands, that would probably be sufficient for IRCC to follow through in revoking the PR's status.
All of which is to say that just because there is an optical link between the move to another province and subsequent revocation of status action by IRCC, the revocation action itself is predicated on fraud NOT on the subsequent move to another province. No charter mobility rights implicated.