Scenario: biological father doesnt want to sign the consent. Daughter is 15 years old. No any kind of aupport from father for 5 years. What should i do? Please share if you have the same experience...thanks!!!
No ...aside from that is there any other way o can bring my faughter here anyway the father is not supporting her at all.truesmile said:Do you have sole custody of your daughter?
Unless you have sole legal custody or a signed consent, CIC will almost certainly refuse to proceed. It doesn't matter if the father is supporting her or not because this doesn't change his parental rights. Sorry..Jeebrel said:No ...aside from that is there any other way o can bring my faughter here anyway the father is not supporting her at all.
Not sure why location of visa office is needed. The fact of the matter is that as long as the father doesn't give consent, CIC will not proceed for PR for daughter. Doesn't matter where the visa office is. The law is the law.d_j_heckford said:I could possibly give you some imput but need to know first where your visa office is located.
Hi,d_j_heckford said:I could possibly give you some imput but need to know first where your visa office is located.
Please don't hijack someone else's thread. IF you have your own questions please start your own thread.Lotus2015 said:Hi,
I have the sole custody and I am unable to sponsor my son is there any way to solve this situation?
I believe you're looking for him to sign a "Consent to Travel" form to allow you to take your daughter across the border, right? I think there's some confusion here as to whether your looking for him to consent to a PR.Jeebrel said:Scenario: biological father doesnt want to sign the consent. Daughter is 15 years old. No any kind of aupport from father for 5 years. What should i do? Please share if you have the same experience...thanks!!!
Signing a document to allow to cross borders is not the same as permission to let the child leave permanently out of the country. The big difference is one can be charge with kidnapping despite allowing permission to cross borders.swestenzweig said:I believe you're looking for him to sign a "Consent to Travel" form to allow you to take your daughter across the border, right? I think there's some confusion here as to whether your looking for him to consent to a PR.
My wife has joint custody of her daughter with her biological father (I am the step-father). As I am American and they are all Canadian, my wife has stipulated in the divorce agreement that her daughter's biological father would sign the consent to travel form for normal travel. So, he is obligated by the courts to do so. That being said, the US Border Services agent at the gate has never asked her to provide the consent to travel form (she has travelled across with her daughter about 5 times).
I would proceed with caution, however. I understand your frustration with your daughter's biological father, but I would strongly suggest proceeding through legal means to establish sole custody of your daughter or work out an agreement for him to consent to travel abroad. If you are trying to remove her from a bad situation by taking her out of the country (as indicated by your responses), I can understand her father's reluctance to sign that consent. In that case, her father can take pre-emptive actions that could make things a lot more difficult for the both of you.
To me this is not a hijack. Do we not want to see practically exactly the same type of scenarios on the same thread? I know I sure do.SchnookoLoly said:Please don't hijack someone else's thread. IF you have your own questions please start your own thread.
I think it is. It's not exactly the same question, and it means that two discussions are happening in one thread, one is bound to get buried and it gets difficult to keep track of. If it were a resolved case that might be different, but for asking questions it's just easier and helps the thread stay organized to keep it to just one question/scearnio. That's JMO, though - it ensures everyone gets answers to their own questions.truesmile said:To me this is not a hijack. Do we not want to see practically exactly the same type of scenarios on the same thread? I know I sure do.