++++1itsmyid said:I started on visa myself and could benefit from the credit. I was just saying there's no need to divide ourselves and claim who is more qualified than others, that doesn't help anybody
++++1itsmyid said:I started on visa myself and could benefit from the credit. I was just saying there's no need to divide ourselves and claim who is more qualified than others, that doesn't help anybody
The issue here is that a commentator here insinuated that bill c6 is a bad bill and students should not be allowed to count th days spent in Canada before they became PR. They don't understand that students and refugees, temporary workers have to pay taxes on day one. Therefore it's only fair for them to benefit from days before they became PR towards citizenship. C24 is a reckless and unfair bill.itsmyid said:Again, I am not arguing about getting the credit - I want that too. I am only commenting on the statement someone made about student being more deserving of immigration than people came with a PR card
Joshua1 said:The issue here is that a commentator here insinuated that bill c6 is a bad bill and students should not be allowed to count th days spent in Canada before they became PR. They don't understand that students and refugees, temporary workers have to pay taxes on day one. Therefore it's only fair for them to benefit from days before they became PR towards citizenship. C24 is a reckless and unfair bill.
Dear All,
I am new to this forum, i have a question to ask if someone guide me. If i apply today for Citizenship and give an undertaking that i will reside in Canada and get citizenship, but after Bill C-6 get approval so the undertaking to reside still be valid on me or i can leave Canada and have a job in Dubai.
Joshua1 said:The issue here is that a commentator here insinuated that bill c6 is a bad bill and students should not be allowed to count th days spent in Canada before they became PR. They don't understand that students and refugees, temporary workers have to pay taxes on day one. Therefore it's only fair for them to benefit from days before they became PR towards citizenship. C24 is a reckless and unfair bill.
Dear All,
I am new to this forum, i have a question to ask if someone guide me. If i apply today for Citizenship and give an undertaking that i will reside in Canada and get citizenship, but after Bill C-6 get approval so the undertaking to reside still be valid on me or i can leave Canada and have a job in Dubai.
The bill will make it as if that line is no longer there. You can go work anywhere you want after you get citizenship.Tariq khan yousafzai said:Dear All,
I am new to this forum, i have a question to ask if someone guide me. If i apply today for Citizenship and give an undertaking that i will reside in Canada and get citizenship, but after Bill C-6 get approval so the undertaking to reside still be valid on me or i can leave Canada and have a job in Dubai.
Tariq khan yousafzai said:Some will defer, but it's really simple. According to CIC (and common sense), one C24 is repealed, the provision applies to everyone. "All Canadians are free to move outside Canada. This is a right guaranteed in the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.Joshua1 said:The issue here is that a commentator here insinuated that bill c6 is a bad bill and students should not be allowed to count th days spent in Canada before they became PR. They don't understand that students and refugees, temporary workers have to pay taxes on day one. Therefore it's only fair for them to benefit from days before they became PR towards citizenship. C24 is a reckless and unfair bill.
Dear All,
I am new to this forum, i have a question to ask if someone guide me. If i apply today for Citizenship and give an undertaking that i will reside in Canada and get citizenship, but after Bill C-6 get approval so the undertaking to reside still be valid on me or i can leave Canada and have a job in Dubai.
+++++Imadassadi said:I think we should get the Opportunity of the current amendments and try to email the MP's and the santee to extend the pre-PR days credit period to 2 years instead on one year .
And a sure way to cause even more delay in the already much-delayed discussing/passing processSufferInCan said:+++++
Agree. This is the only way that amendments (i.e. delays) would make sense in this critical timing, otherwise, they should forget about the amendments now and introduce them separately.
Good luck with that! and I am sure the all the santee will be happy to hear that tooImadassadi said:I think we should get the Opportunity of the current amendments and try to email the MP's and the santee to extend the pre-PR days credit period to 2 years instead on one year .
You must be joking!!!Imadassadi said:I think we should get the Opportunity of the current amendments and try to email the MP's and the santee to extend the pre-PR days credit period to 2 years instead on one year .
Let's try for full credit why 2 years only. If you pass legal time on Work Permit or Student they must count your days right...Imadassadi said:I think we should get the Opportunity of the current amendments and try to email the MP's and the santee to extend the pre-PR days credit period to 2 years instead on one year .
LOL I thought I heard them all on this thread but this quote just took things to a whole new level.Imadassadi said:I think we should get the Opportunity of the current amendments and try to email the MP's and the santee to extend the pre-PR days credit period to 2 years instead on one year .