agreeMarceauBletard said:I'm listening to it. I don't know what to think about it, honestly.
It feels like it's going in all directions.
agreeMarceauBletard said:I'm listening to it. I don't know what to think about it, honestly.
It feels like it's going in all directions.
https://www.thestar.com/news/immigration/2015/03/20/government-studies-immigrant-incomes-by-where-they-come-from.htmlnofrills said:Do you have any evidence to either of these claims? I suspect not.
Hmmm and the argument is...MarceauBletard said:Wow, the lawyer Julie Taub is strongly against C6...
All the usual... For now, she put an emphasis on the fact that that Canada allows Citizenship faster than most other countries, she said Switzerland it takes 12 years, etc...adey786 said:Hmmm and the argument is...
Thanks. Interesting arguments thoughMarceauBletard said:All the usual... For now, she put an emphasis on the fact that that Canada allows Citizenship faster than most other countries, she said Switzerland it takes 12 years, etc...
And she's talking about Citizens of convenience who live abroad and send their Children to Canadian schools to Canadian people's expense...
Well with the committee I was not expecting a whitewash for c6. However Julie is expressing her thoughts but the senators will take into account all witness - and the discussions with earlier witness was strong pro C6.MarceauBletard said:Wow, the lawyer Julie Taub is strongly against C6...
She's bringing out of scope comments . Talking about the fact of those people coming to T.O or Vancouver to invest in properties and leaving them vacant is irrelevant .. I don't see what is the problem of Canadian citizens naturalized or born here taking opportunities abroad ..MarceauBletard said:All the usual... For now, she put an emphasis on the fact that that Canada allows Citizenship faster than most other countries, she said Switzerland it takes 12 years, etc...
And she's talking about Citizens of convenience who live abroad and send their Children to Canadian schools to Canadian people's expense...
She has a reasonable if not exaggerated point - citizens of convenience, likely does not apply to folks on this forum.tyl92 said:She's bringing out of scope comments . Talking about the fact of those people coming to T.O or Vancouver to invest in properties and leaving them vacant is irrelevant .. I don't see what is the problem of Canadian citizens naturalized or born here taking opportunities abroad ..
Your point was that "people living on social assistance are more native born than first generation immigrants" - the article you quoted indicates that those from western countries are doing well and those from developing countries are considered low-income. If anything this disproves your point.itsmyid said:https://www.thestar.com/news/immigration/2015/03/20/government-studies-immigrant-incomes-by-where-they-come-from.html
People from the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, South Africa, Ireland, Italy, Germany, Australia, the Philippines, Croatia, Portugal, Serbia and India did as well or better than native-born Canadians, the study said.
At the other end of the spectrum, almost one-fifth of those from China, Haiti, Pakistan, Ethiopia, Turkey, Colombia, Iran, Morocco, Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Algeria, South Korea, Iraq and Taiwan lived below the low income cut-off ($18,759 for a single person in Toronto).
You can do the math yourself
Still unfounded...And how many of those are permanent residents wanting to get citizenship? I suspect not that many,
what are you talking about ?nofrills said:She has a reasonable if not exaggerated point - citizens of convenience, likely does not apply to folks on this forum.
tyl92 said:what are you talking about ?
Taube seems to be at the loosing end of the rope - was not able to justify her thoughtstyl92 said:what are you talking about ?
Actually thanks for the wiki page but i knew what citizens of convenience meant .. what i just don't get is your point about people in this forum..nofrills said:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canadians_of_convenience
She's referring to people have a passport so they can enjoy benefits but not pay taxes, live here or contribute.
She's particularly salty !