Revocation that would lead to statelessness would not be permitted UNLESS the citizenship was obtained either through fraudulent means, or through misrepresentation.
If the minister opined that you had misrepresented your intent to reside in Canada BEFORE becoming a citizen, then he can in theory at least pursue revoking your citizenship due to misrepresentation, regardless whether you would become stateless after revocation.
This is why the 'intent-to-reside' clause may be dangerous, and a lot of naturalized Canadians (who naturalize after the new rule passes) would all of a sudden become vulnerable to revocation, even if they do not have any other citizenships.
If the minister opined that you had misrepresented your intent to reside in Canada BEFORE becoming a citizen, then he can in theory at least pursue revoking your citizenship due to misrepresentation, regardless whether you would become stateless after revocation.
This is why the 'intent-to-reside' clause may be dangerous, and a lot of naturalized Canadians (who naturalize after the new rule passes) would all of a sudden become vulnerable to revocation, even if they do not have any other citizenships.