OK, I came across a news article where Kenney himself confirmed that the government won't take long to do a review of the program. But then again, this is just a new level of being vague. I still can't tell if this means weeks or months.
You say it's not a slave labour thing but that was never my opinion, it is that of Canadians that I have already discussed the matter with. So while this is your opinion and I respect it, there are a lot of ways someone could see it. Same about the wage point. You say they get paid more, even at the very next post by PMM, you see the exact opposite point, that they're cheap labour. I can address both points and answer respectively but it would be better if we decide what the actual reality is first. Cheap/slave labour or getting paid more than Canadians and leaving them unemployed?keesio said:Again the issue here is that Canadians are upset that foreign workers were paid MORE and favored over Canadian workers. It's not a slave labour thing. It's that employers preferred foreign workers and rather pay them more. Canadians were losing their jobs.
The people that the government will listen to are Canadians (i.e. "voters"), not foreigners who want to apply for TFW or currently working as a TFW. So the people to convince are your local Canadians. But right now, people see businesses are "greedy" and against the "poor" Canadian worker. The Canadian citizen is angry at big business and the Conservative government (who they view as business friendly over the average worker).
Hi,PMM said:Hi
The restaurant owners like the source of cheap labour. If they are unable to obtain overseas TFWs then they would have to increase wages to attract PRs/Canadians. An example, is an Indian restaurant owner with 22 cooks in his 3 restaurants, all TFWs. He claims that he can't find residents for the jobs. Odd with the high percentage of Indians in Canada, that none are cooks?
These Canadians (and PR's like yourself also) need to get your voices out there publicly. Currently the discussion is extremely one sided. Go to any article regarding the subject and in the comments section, it is overwhelmingly negative towards TFW, big business and the Conservative government. Right now, there is no visible public support for TFW among Canadians. That is the problem. The media is also one sided, writing stores of crying Canadians that got laid off from their jobs. Supporters of TFW have to contact the media and show the positives of the program. The problem is that it cannot come from business owners since there is a big backlash against them.beholder69 said:As for your last point, I might not be a Canadian yet but I'm a soon-to-be PR, already working for almost a year legally here, married to a Canadian and trust me when I say I already got tons of Canadians here apart from her, who find this move from stupid to dangerous. So I stand by my initial question as to where someone could complain to.
I certainly agree with youkeesio said:These Canadians (and PR's like yourself also) need to get your voices out there publicly. Currently the discussion is extremely one sided. Go to any article regarding the subject and in the comments section, it is overwhelmingly negative towards TFW, big business and the Conservative government. Right now, there is no visible public support for TFW among Canadians. That is the problem. The media is also one sided, writing stores of crying Canadians that got laid off from their jobs. Supporters of TFW have to contact the media and show the positives of the program. The problem is that it cannot come from business owners since there is a big backlash against them.
So, does this mean that they're shutting down the food service sector completely now?attagirl said:Please check esdc.gc.ca announcement on twp.
OK, the wording in their update is very confusing. Is it still 'suspended' or is it now shut down for good for those NOCs? It's been two whole days and now they're deciding to refund LMO processing fees now. This does not look like a good sign.attagirl said:Please check esdc.gc.ca announcement on twp.