I second u on this point.
What was the point of accepting more applications when cic already had pool of applicants with them.
they cud have filtered those applicants whose occupations were in demand instead of launching m1,m2,mx...
seems cic has jst waken up frm sound sleep.
sheer injustice.
What was the point of accepting more applications when cic already had pool of applicants with them.
they cud have filtered those applicants whose occupations were in demand instead of launching m1,m2,mx...
seems cic has jst waken up frm sound sleep.
sheer injustice.
jemini said:This is a very bad news for old applicants and we all have to support the aggrieved parties.
There are followig points from my side for legal case:
1-Why the minister did not look at the backlog pool applicants for professions in demand before picking the categories for professions in demand for M1,M2, M3.??This is huge negligence on thier part.
2-If the minister had taken this decesion to return the back log applicants in June 2010,before the announcement of M1, M2, M3
categories , the old applicants could apply in new categories, but now they cannot apply as thier categories have dropped from the lists ,by doing that the minister has spoiled the future of old applicants which is not totally thier fault.This fact should be put before the parliament.
3-what a huge comparison that at one side the immigration department of canada has admitted that thousands of immigrants have obtained canadian nationality by Fraud in past and the department has done nothing against them whereas on the other side there are innocent applicants before 2008 who are waiting since 6-7 years and want to contribute to canadian economy by fair means , but without thier fault they are being punished.
4. I think a competent lawyer should win this case. Because in Uk it was happened in "Judicial Review" in HSMP cases.
Logged