jes_ON
VIP Member
- Jun 22, 2009
- 1,421
- Category........
- Visa Office......
- New York
- Job Offer........
- Pre-Assessed..
- App. Filed.......
- 06-May-2010
- AOR Received.
- 13-Aug-2010
- File Transfer...
- 01-Mar-2011
- Passport Req..
- 30-Jun-2011
- VISA ISSUED...
- 12-Jul-2011 (received 25-Jul-2011)
- LANDED..........
- 03-Sep-2011
Of course he can answer "yes" to the section question, because he has been working for that employer for over a year!DelPiero07 said:Here is the issue, look at the new questions regarding work experience:
Is ###### 's job offer from the employer named on the current work permit?
Has ###### been working full-time for the employer on their current work permit for at least one year? (Or for an equal amount of part time work?)
He can answer "Yes" to the first question but certainly he cannot say "Yes" to the second question.
But I see the confusion - it's a matter of how you parse the sentence. Tough, when commas should have been used, but weren't.
A. working full-time "for the employer on their current work permit" for at least one year?
B. working full-time for the employer "on their current work permit for at least one year"?
Does "on their current work permit" modify employer, or working? Based on the the wording of the ministerial instructions, as well as the page on "offer of employment," I think it modifies "employer." http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/immigrate/skilled/offer.asp
To the OP - you can call IRCC, but help center employees often have little information on program requirements. It's a new rule, it's possible IRCC agents will be confused as well, so the best I can say is whatever you decide, tell us how it works out!!!