dentist82 said:
Motabhai.......aapde logically joye toh maro personal view aa che(thinking logically this is my personal view....it may or may not differ from others)
AFAIK,
MI1 has some approx. 1,20000 applns pending across different VOs
MI2 has lets say approx 10000 to 12000 applns pending across different VOs
MI3 has lets say approx. 5000 to 6000 applns pending across different VOs
Now if they take a simultaneous approach(that means giving importance to all MIs and not priortizing a single MI)............................................ for every 1 MI3 appln, they need to process 2 MI2 applns and 5 MI1 applns. This approach may delay MI3 applns personally. No way its possible that they can clear backlog of MI1,2 and 3 till December,2012. As I'm an MI3 applicant, I hope they don't take this approach.
- If they think of still processing MI3 applications on priority(which is the approach I think they gonna take. Across, VO's they can still complete all MI3 and MI2 applns(in total 17k) till December 2012. This would be good as they can get rid of two MI's backlog.
By what LVO has hinted by giving 6 months wait letter to many applications from MI1, chances are that they gonna take the latter approach(simultaneous processing of MI2 and 3), which is very good news for all.
Any which ways, be ready to be patient till December 2012(we can expect complete processing by Dec).
I would be happy if they do it earlier personally.
PS:MY PERSONAL VIEW
