Ok, if we assume that arranged employment is only beneficial for people who want to apply through that stream, then what does the following quote mean? If the person has one job offer in hand before applying, why should there be the following rule?Anna2013 said:The benefit of having arrange employment before you apply is that you have the "option" of applying under the stream that is for "individuals with arranged employment"; i.e., you can choose that stream rather than PhD stream. CIC might be nicer with that category (I don't know I am just saying). Also, I think you do not have to show you have the required amount of funding in your bank account.
But if you apply and then later get the job offer, then it is too late. That job offer does not help you in any ways.
I can't conclude anything, but the following means that those who got a job offer in the middle, should get points. It would be meaningless to award points to an applicant who applied through "arranged employment" stream, and then got an arranged employment in the middle!!?? So this rule should be applied to some other streams inside federal skilled worker? Why should they exclude PhD stream from such points?
Section 9.15 of OP6B:
"if the applicant or their spouse or common-law partner completes further study, works in Canada, arranges employment in Canada, or gains relatives in Canada between application and assessment, and submits the necessary documentation, points must be awarded accordingly."