erfan1985:
erfan1985 said:
Are you sure about this? In that case all PhD student would be illegible as they are all doing research and assisting faculties. Wouldn't they distinguish TA/RA from regular student activities toward research and thesis? And what should be written about the salary? Wouldn't it be problematic if they bring the name of scholarship? And How many hours a week would that be? We are all working full time for school!
Some time ago I wrote two posts in this thread (http://www.canadavisa.com/canada-immigration-discussion-board/applicant-from-phd-program-after-5-nov-2011-connect-here-to-get-status-t87348.0.html;msg2181904#msg2181904 and http://www.canadavisa.com/canada-immigration-discussion-board/applicant-from-phd-program-after-5-nov-2011-connect-here-to-get-status-t87348.0.html;msg2446968#msg2446968) which might answer some of your questions. All of us do research that counts towards our PhD, but also becomes a part of our adviser's portfolio, and from this prospective what we do is valid RA. As to where is that "divide", it's hard to say---I think it is up to you and your adviser to decide. Usually people here claim <20 hours per week.
Also, I am not sure if this is what you were asking but to qualify under NOC 4012 as a "Post-secondary teaching and research assistant" you
have to prove that you were doing research and assisting a faculty memner. If you don't show it, they will refuse your application as lacking work experience.
As for the source of income, it does not matter if it is taxable or non-taxable---I think it was asbereth who pointed out that the definition of employment does not require that your salary be taxable. From this prospective, scholarships are a valid source of income.
Hope that helps.