hamoon said:
I included RA/TA, also had some work experience. Sent both. As you know when they give you PER, they don't let you know how they have counted the points, but I had the maximum point for the English test I didn't need the adaptability points. This might be helpful for you, A friend of mine got NER at that time, she wrote them an email mentioning that they haven't counted the adaptability points and then she received PER. Now she is at the doc request stage, waiting for Medical request. BTW I started my PhD in May 2008 and applied on Dec 2012 so I had more RA/TA than some of you guys. You need to consider this as well.
Hi hamoon, thanks for sharing. It does look like Ottawa would grant you the 5 adaptability points if Sydney gave you the 5 points to begin with.
For example, if you got NER, then appealed, and your NER was overturned to PER, then most likely, Ottawa too would honor this decision by Sydney and also grant you the 5 adaptability points for previous study (such as the case with your friend, and also with MapleDream, though MapleDream was eventually rejected for a different reason; the reason why I think she already had more than enough points was because if they didn't, then rejection would come before they even requested any documents; the fact the Ottawa requested these documents from her should mean that they already found her eligible in selection factor).
Likewise, if you applied after April 2012, then most likely Sydney would automatically grant you the 5 points, so these people would probably be okay too (I think websphereguy requested the CAIPS notes, and he mentioned the 5 adaptability points for previous study were there).
The question is, how about those that did not get awarded these points by Sydney (April applications onwards seemed to have been granted these 5 points automatically). Would they also get the 5 points? I suspect that they won't be, since Dani1982 did not when he was rejected, and his appeal was also rejected.