Thank you very much, pyzdfr
I heard examples that some PhD students failed to receive 5 points for study, as full time studies are officially defined as "at least 15 hours of classes per week".
Can you please kindly let me know
1) if you have any other study experience in Canada in addition to your PhD study. If yes, then it might be these other study experiences instead of the PhD study that give you the 5 points.
2) whether your letter of attestation is sealed in the envelop (that is, you did not OPEN it) when you mail it to CIC. It sounds silly, but I think sealed in the envelop somehow makes the letter more convincing
3) If you opened and read the letter, would you mind telling me whether it is explicitly stated on the letter that "the student has finished at least two academic years of full-time study" or something similar to that. As far as I guess, since no PhD transcript is provided, the officer officer cannot judge whether "at least 15 hours of classes per week" is satisfied.
Please feel free to message me if you don't want to post.
I asked this question many times from different users. Only one applicant in this forum was not awarded this point. But this person passed the eligibility and he/she is currently waiting for PPR. All other members got this point. Don't worry. Look at my previous comment for this adaptability point and you will be convinced. In the regulation of OP 6C which they are using for assessing applications there is no "15 hours" and it only says full time. Even in another page of CIC the definition of full-time study status is determined by your institution.
Thanks very much for your valuable help.
Best