Greetings Everyone!
First of all, I'd like to heartily thank all of you in this forum, seniors & contemporary applicants, for your thoughtful and kind suggestions and sharing own experiences. I've been a silent lurker of this forum since the time I was preparing to apply last year. At that time, I was immensely helped & guided by your suggestions. Your emphasis on proper experience letters was extremely crucial and I gathered my documents accordingly then. This forum also gave me clear idea about the different steps of PR process after application which I was completely unaware of before. I received benefits from the forum in many ways and will try to repay this favor for future applicants. Recently I received MR and RPRF requests ;D.
Dear Admin, plz include me in the tracker list. My specifics are:
1. Application reached CIO: Oct 7, 2013
2. Visa office selected: Ottawa
3. CC encashed: Dec 11, 2013
4. PER issued: Dec 23, 2013
5. No. of Persons: 2
6. Doc request: None (PCCs + bank statements were sent with application initially)
7. RPRF request: July 23, 2014
8. Medical request: July 23, 2014
9. Current eCAS: In Process
10. Nationality: Bangladesh
11. NOC codes included: 2147 (home country), 4012 (during PhD), 4011 (home country)
12. Primary NOC selected in sche3 form: 2147 (**had strong reference letters from home country)
Few other things I'd like to elaborate which might give some new idea to future applicants:
a) I only added RA experience (with NOC 4012) as a secondary experience. However I followed this forum's suggestion to carefully gather those letters from supervisor, HR-Payroll dept. and I think they were solid enough to go through as primary occupation. I was just fearful about it and didn't select it as primary NOC because many past candidates were rejected with RA/TA experience. I suggest future applicants to take highest care about experience letters and provide extra supporting documents like paystubs, T4, earning details explanation letter etc. The letter from HR-Payroll dept. defined my hours and salary which varied over the length of 2 years because I worked in different projects. The total no. of hours was nearly 2000. My supervisor wrote 2 letters for me. In the 1st letter, he explained my duties as RA with lead statement. He also referred the visa officer to that Payroll letter to find out salary & hours. In this way, these letters were complementary and not contradictory. In the 2nd letter, my supervisor described my progress of PhD studies which he mentioned is different from my RA duties. To avoid confusion, I did not include TA at all because it was not continuous (no TA in summer terms).
b) I received 10 adaptability points (from GCMS):
5 = previous study in Canada (however not exactly sure that it comes from 2 years PhD because I also completed 2 years Masters in Canada before starting PhD),
5 = spouse IELTS language proficiency.
c) I noticed with my contemporary applicants (aalm, sia_kb8, civil656, Bobrovsky1, vasyok) that they changed the RPRF email language. My officer number is “Program Assistant DB00204 – CPC-O” and I did not find the word ‘eligibility' at all. But as suggested by a senior here earlier, I too think that they did the NOC checks before sending medical requests. However, I think this language is more appropriate because according to OP 6-C document, ‘eligibility' also includes the verification of medical and criminal admissibility. Seniors are welcome to share their views on this topic.
This forum is great! Thanks again and good luck to all of us!