AOR JUNE 2016 >>> JOIN HERE
- Thread starter andy108
- Start date
Guys... I received a donotreply cic email saying "There have been no updates to your application"....What does that even mean?! why would they send an email just to tell me there is no update.... I almost had a heart attack there
Hello People,
AOR: June 28th
Review of Eligibility: IN progress
Review of Medicals: Passed
Review of Submitted documents: Provided
Scheduling of interview: Not needed
Background check: in progress
Final decision: Not started
AOR: June 28th
Review of Eligibility: IN progress
Review of Medicals: Passed
Review of Submitted documents: Provided
Scheduling of interview: Not needed
Background check: in progress
Final decision: Not started
er.satnamsinghbhullar
Hero Member
- Apr 30, 2016
- 7
- Category........
- Job Offer........
- Pre-Assessed..
- AOR Received.
- 15 june
- Med's Done....
- 25 june
It's valid for 1 year. However, we should do the landing with COPR before the medical expires.civic14 said:
I wonder if your medical was intended for EE cause you mentioned for your work permit. Medical for WP is different.
Here's the thread with the same issue as yours.
http://www.canadavisa.com/canada-immigration-discussion-board/medical-status-change-from-passed-to-in-progress-t381996.0.html
Why do you ask for updates? So can compare Vos? Updates? And then refer them to someone else?and others get no help??er.satnamsinghbhullar said:
This thread is dedicated for you and others in your position..you dont offer to help yet refer them off ..you provide no answers...before you comment..take time and think before you comment here, think again
Seems to me you only care about yourself..im sorry its the truth..i came here on this thread to help you..and those who needed answers after docs submission..
good luck in your journey ppl...my last post in ur thread ..take care
Best wishes
Hey Bro,lazybone said:Why do you ask for updates? So can compare Vos? Updates? And then refer them to someone else?and others get no help??
This thread is dedicated for you and others in your position..you dont offer to help yet refer them off ..you provide no answers...before you comment..take time and think before you comment here, think again
Seems to me you only care about yourself..im sorry its the truth..i came here on this thread to help you..and those who needed answers after docs submission..
good luck in your journey ppl...my last post in ur thread ..take care
Best wishes
You are doing an amazing job by helping out these wandering clueless souls, just don't react and take a decision which will hurt others.
You are an assest to the group and we all appreciate your commitment in helping out others but please don't quit, some people are liabilities and as in economics we have to take along those with us when calculating profits
.. And that's life....We all are indebted to you, specially me.... So please consider rest of the good people and keep us helping with your valuable assistance.
``Sumit
canadaiamcoming
Star Member
Thanks Lazyb One ( I feel you are an Active One and +1 from my side too.) Apologized for delayed reply to your post as I was out of town for holidays.lazybone said:
I know LMIA (Out land) is fund exempt but some of information on CIC is vague or ambiguous. For example, http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/resources/tools/perm/express/refuse.asp
Settlement funds
Settlement funds are not included in the CRS. They do, however, relate to the program requirements of FSWC and FSTC and may, by extension, be included in the MEC for Express Entry.
Candidates applying under the FSWC or the FSTC are required to meet the settlement funds requirement, unless they are currently authorized to work in Canada and have a qualifying offer of arranged employment from an employer in Canada.
They used word AND - that means have to fulfill both conditions mentioned above. Because, as of now, we are not authorized to work in Canada based on positive LMIA (for FSW Out land) until we get our PR status. If it were OR - than it would be crystal clear that having arranged employment wont required PoF.
Actually my friend who is FSW (O) with LMIA has received GCMS with following notes.
PAGE 9
FUNDS
Number of Family Members: 2
Minimum Funds: Not Met
MST Funds Exempt: N
FSW Fund Exempt: N
LAST PAGE:
His R10 - OK, A11.2 - MET, 75(2) FSW Minimum Requirements - Appears Met, 76(1)(a) - Selection Criteria - FSW POINTS - Appears Met
NOTE: Failed Candidate - note that proof of funds appears not met (Job offer provided) - At CIO 15 July 2016 - updated by GM01154
{Whereas my GCMS has cleared R10, A11.2, 75(2) & 76(1)(a) - Passed Candidate and no notes about PoF.
Page 9 of my GCMS -
FUNDS
Number of Famlily Members: 2
Minimum Funds: Met
MST Funds Exempt: N
FSW Funds Exempt: N - Both Notes indicates FSW Funds Exempt: N - That is the reason I raised the query, however, my funds seems MET though I have not provided Proof of Fund. } {This is excerpt of my notes}
My friends notes updated on 19 July while transferring to NDVO -
PAGE 73:
APPLICATION:5
Field Name: Eligibility
Action: Updated
Old Value: Met
New Value: Not Started
Updated Date: 2016/07/19
Updated By: AW01174
Office: Centralized Intake Office
APPLICATION: 7
Field Name: Eligibility
Action: Updated
Old Valud: Review Required
New Value: Met
Updated Date: 2016/07/15
Updated By: GM01154
Office: Centralized Intake Office
So I can assume that his eligibility is cleared by same officer i.e. GM01154 and sent for review to NDVO.
What is your opinion whether he will face any problem due to Proof of Fund or It is not required as his eligibility is MET at CIO level.
Awaits your opinion.