With all do respect, please don't call my lawyer and idiot. That's rude and unprofessional.
Now, with that aside, I would like to double check against another website, which says:
"A new law amending the Citizenship Act will come into effect on April 17, 2009. The new law will give Canadian citizenship to certain people who lost it and to others who will be recognized as citizens for the first time... The law restores citizenship to people who: became citizens when the first citizenship act took effect on January 1, 1947, including people born in Canada prior to 1947 and war brides. It also applies to other British subjects who had lived in Canada for at least five years before 1947, became citizens on January 1, 1947, and who then lost citizenship."
Now, I take that to mean that my great, great, great grandfather, who was a British Subject that moved to a British territory that eventually became Canada, not only maintained his subject status, but also gave me the opportunity to apply for Canadian citizenship via descent. I would post the link in my reply, but I am being told I am not allowed to post links in this thread. Nonetheless, is the quote from the website just a misrepresentation of the law? What source are you using to counter my argument?