+1(514) 937-9445 or Toll-free (Canada & US) +1 (888) 947-9445
virgiemaricel said:
Hi! I applied in October 2004. I took another IELTS in 2009 because the first IELTS resuts already expired. Got PPR in December 2010. Hope this helps.

Congrats !!
 
kchakus said:
Hi Virgiemaricel,
Did you submit your IELTS results before or is this the first time your taking up your IELTS test?
I'm asking you this to clarify whether applicants who had submitted their IELTS report in 2007 should
also take up their test again now to prove their language fluency.
Thanks

When I submitted my docus in October 2004, IELTS result was included. In 2006, it expired. I took another IELTS in 2009 to update the result because embassy asked for updated docus.
 
i want to submit my timelines.
applied in jan 2004,new delhi chc through consultants
got updation in sep 2008
medical done in sep 2010
landing fee deposited in sep 2010
still waiting for ppr
any clues
 
Feb 2007 applicant. ND. No news after the letter asking confirmation of continued interest. :(
 
Based on my observations and understanding, I guess one of these could be the plan for CIC in the coming years:

1. First and foremost, complete all applications filed from Feb 27 2008 to Feb 26, 2010 asap. This is happening now and hence this is confirmed.

2. Second, then take up applications from backlog, i.e 2003-2004 onwards and also applications from Feb 27 2010 in parallel or

3. Third, process all 2003/2004 applications on priority for the year 2011 or

4. Fourth, process Feb 27, 2010 applications on priority for the year 2011 or

5. Mr.Jason Kenney has some other plan up his sleeve. Introduce a new list of NOC and process them on priority. Possible, since he'z the immigration minister
 
I agree with your 5th plan >:(
 
FRIENDS, WHEN WILL 2004 APPLICANTS WHO APPLIED FROM NEW DELHI GET VISA? IT IS AROUND SEVEN YEARS PAST AND NO SIGNS OF MEDICALS.
 
Neglect in Canada’s Immigration Systems

Over the years, Canada has attracted millions of business class immigrants into its borders to help boost the country’s economy. However, Canada’s immigration system is failing.

The agencies that have promised to monitor the progress of the immigrants that they sent in have not been doing a comprehensive evaluation of the immigration system as they have promised.

What they were supposed to do
The immigration system is a well lubricated machine, at least it is supposed to be. Immigration agencies advertise special programs to attract different types of working class immigrants into working in the country. Various provinces also look into the immigration system and use these agencies so that their immigrants get transferred quickly into the country. The whole process of accepting immigrants and transferring them to the various provinces are supposed to be monitored by these agencies so that a proper and comprehensive evaluation of the immigration system can give a transparent visual on the primary effects and profits of the immigration system.

Where they went astray
These agencies like Citizenship and Immigration Canda (CIC) promised to evaluate the progress of their programs to ensure that the taxpayers are getting their money’s worth. However, in 2009, Auditor General Sheila Fraser shed the light on the growing neglect by these companies on providing comprehensive reports on the evaluation of their immigration programs. She explained that these immigration agencies have incomplete data on the progress of the working immigrants that they hire into the country. These allegations have prompted the immigration agencies to make a promise for a more comprehensive report the following year. However, the year has ended and according to Volpe, the Liberal MP for Eglinton-Lawrence in Toronto, he is still waiting for those comprehensive reports.

One of the programs that both working immigrants and provinces use is the Provincial nominee program. Basically, provinces in the country offer jobs to immigrants which of course require these immigrants to settle in their province. However, three provincial auditor generals have already confirmed that their province have no idea where their immigrants are.

How they are going to fix it
These immigration agencies have been advised by Fraser that the best way to solve the problem is for them to have a clear and detailed long-term plan for their programs. These programs which as of now do not have a clear definition on how many immigrants they let in to the program should define these issues right away.
 
To everyone,
Please clear about IELTS ,Is there any validity of it?
 
noman said:
To everyone,
Please clear about IELTS ,Is there any validity of it?

EFFECTIVE December 23, 2010: If you are submitting a language test with your application, the results are now valid for 2 years from the time you took the test, instead of 1 year. This change applies to Federal skilled worker, Canadian Experience Class and Business Class Immigrants (investors, entrepreneurs and self-employed people).

http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/immigrate/index.asp
 
Hi, Friends,
Any updates regarding future of all the old applicants who have been in turmoil since last 7-8 years because of the prudent?????? decision of the Canadian expert to stop the old applicants and take only the new ones applying after Feb. 2008 , pls. share.

Regards,
 
Hi SKGSSP
you are right saying, CHC London work fast track applicant,
Listen few months ago some backlog applicant receive document update letter.
otherwise no change
Hamayun
 
hi guys,

I sent application in Nov 2004, manila visa office. Still waiting for MR.
 
hi!my application was received april 2006 and ive checked my status in the net it says processing...so until when do we have to wait?