I have a question about people who have to appeal because of misrepresentation. Is it even possible to win an appeal if the misrepresentation was completely due to the sponsor/applicant purposely omitting info or submitting false info?
I always thought they could only win if it's proven that CIC made a mistake and that the sponsor/applicant has documents to prove it. Like for example, if CIC refuses a couple because they misrepresented by saying one person has never been married, but the couple sent proof showing that a marriage search reveals that the person was in fact, never married, so then they should win the appeal.
But if it's someone for example, who lied and said he/she never married before, but CIC found out that they did, how is it possible to appeal and win something like this? Because an appeal is basically another way of saying, "CIC you made a mistake in your decision to refuse us, and we have evidence to prove you made a mistake", an appeal isn't saying "We know we made a mistake, but please give us another chance"?