the hearing was in Ottawa , but the judge or and don't know how to call thee was in Montreal so our hearing was via a video conference , so I was my lawyer and I and ADR member in Ottawa . yes I had a lawyer just because our case was really complicated , there 7 yrs different between us , different culture , different country , back ground , rname it it's us . to be honest there no way I could of won without the lawyer . those ADR member were firing back at me like crazy , there we using my answer against me and when the call my
husband theey were expecting the same answer and also the wanted to see if his answer where not influence by anything or anybody .
I can't tell u what was the objective on the blue book bcus my lawyer did that and Iits been 3 yrs the only thing I got back from them was the prof we submitted ( pictures )
only advise I can tell u go prepare and submit all the prove u need to . whatever reason of denied will be the main focus during the hearing but yet agin the can pull other stuff just to make themself look like there nothing wrong with there decision , it's right and there are not backing up from its .
Go well prepare and you'll be fine
depending on where u are do I know if u have some type of legal aid clique or university the have walk in Clinique with laws studend that annswers a lot of immigration question . if u where ever interested
Hina 123 said:
Hi childofGod . They usualy say to everyone tht marriage is not genuine. But what was original objection in ur blue book ? How much difference between u n ur spouse ??? I asking bcuz of knowledge. U got ur ful hearing instead of ADR ? U didnt hire a lawyer? Where ur case was heard in canada ?