I am a refugee claimant and I am going to have to go to an admissibility hearing soon. The reason is serious criminality, a conviction in my home country. My asylum claim is based exactly on the statement that I was convicted unlawfully, disregarding due process. I have a counselor with considerable experience, but even he is clueless about what is ahead of me.
I was arrested in February 2018 and released from detention on bail in March. The bail was surprisingly low, only 3000 dollars. My counselor said this is one of the lowest he has ever seen. I applied for a work permit a few months later and I got it in record time, only four days. It was supposed to take about 90-120, but maybe it helped that I'm a software engineer and there's great need for such experts in Canada. Now I work full time at a company in Montreal. Interestingly CBSA hasn't sent a disclosure for an admissibility hearing until now, six months after I was released. This is also said to be uncommon, they usually send the disclosure within a few weeks after they find an admissibility concern.
Do you think these irregularities may indicate that the government doesn't have very strong arguments against my admissibility, or they don't want to go overboard about their concerns? Should I expect a serious battle or just a mere formality? It just makes no sense that they let me live and work in Canada for half a year while they are concerned that I may be a danger to public safety.
Anyone got experience in asylum-related admissibility cases here?
I was arrested in February 2018 and released from detention on bail in March. The bail was surprisingly low, only 3000 dollars. My counselor said this is one of the lowest he has ever seen. I applied for a work permit a few months later and I got it in record time, only four days. It was supposed to take about 90-120, but maybe it helped that I'm a software engineer and there's great need for such experts in Canada. Now I work full time at a company in Montreal. Interestingly CBSA hasn't sent a disclosure for an admissibility hearing until now, six months after I was released. This is also said to be uncommon, they usually send the disclosure within a few weeks after they find an admissibility concern.
Do you think these irregularities may indicate that the government doesn't have very strong arguments against my admissibility, or they don't want to go overboard about their concerns? Should I expect a serious battle or just a mere formality? It just makes no sense that they let me live and work in Canada for half a year while they are concerned that I may be a danger to public safety.
Anyone got experience in asylum-related admissibility cases here?