- Mar 13, 2013
- 18
- Category........
- Visa Office......
- CPP-O
- Job Offer........
- Pre-Assessed..
- App. Filed.......
- 12-Feb-2013
- AOR Received.
- 22-Mar-2013
- Med's Request
- 06-Dec-2013
- Med's Done....
- 16-Dec-2013
- Passport Req..
- 24-Mar-2014
- VISA ISSUED...
- 31-Mar-2014
- LANDED..........
- 10-Apr-2014
So I've been looking into options for landing. I've never been rejected or refused entry to any country, so I've been a little wary of the "administrative refusal". I decided to call up a couple of the US borders to see what their take on it was, and (surprise surprise), got conflicting views about the impact of the refusal on future visa applications to the US.
The immigration guy at Rainbow Bridge said we'll send you right back and if you're asked whether you've been refused in the future, just say no.
The very nice lady at Prescott gave me a very detailed version of the process. She said they will take our passports and "process" us, give us the refusal and then send us back. She said that these refusals are "iffy" and a "grey area", and that if asked about being refused in the future, I would have to say yes and explain that it was for flagpoling.
I've read mixed responses to landing experiences - some people have just been given the refusal, others have had their passports scanned, and some have been fingerprinted. Two weeks ago, a friend and his family spent 6 hours with the US Border officials undergoing security checks. So I know that the refusals get put into the system.
Now, I understand it's not a huge hassle explaining it in the future, but I'm wondering why I should go through it at all if I have the option to land inside Canada. Otherwise, I'll spend the next several years ticking Yes to the question and explaining why I was refused.
Any thoughts?
The immigration guy at Rainbow Bridge said we'll send you right back and if you're asked whether you've been refused in the future, just say no.
The very nice lady at Prescott gave me a very detailed version of the process. She said they will take our passports and "process" us, give us the refusal and then send us back. She said that these refusals are "iffy" and a "grey area", and that if asked about being refused in the future, I would have to say yes and explain that it was for flagpoling.
I've read mixed responses to landing experiences - some people have just been given the refusal, others have had their passports scanned, and some have been fingerprinted. Two weeks ago, a friend and his family spent 6 hours with the US Border officials undergoing security checks. So I know that the refusals get put into the system.
Now, I understand it's not a huge hassle explaining it in the future, but I'm wondering why I should go through it at all if I have the option to land inside Canada. Otherwise, I'll spend the next several years ticking Yes to the question and explaining why I was refused.
Any thoughts?