Because the cut-off was 889. Simple.first01 said:If your client with 860 points was not pciked, how does the rank system work then?
Because the cut-off was 889. Simple.first01 said:If your client with 860 points was not pciked, how does the rank system work then?
Your candidates without those 600 pts would have really struggled to get anything but they might be def. picked up in next round. I am wondering your client who only managed 754....if you deduct 600 for lmia and may be 100 for age then he scored only 186 on other factors such as ielts, education or skills transferability section which is really weird. Do you mind sharing the profile as in which noc they are applying and what is their education, ielts?rjessome said:Not everyone who had an LMIA was picked. I have 4 clients with LMIAs that were not picked. Their points were 754, 860, 729 and 832.
Agree ! Got one missing only a few pointsrjessome said:Not everyone who had an LMIA was picked. I have 4 clients with LMIAs that were not picked. Their points were 754, 860, 729 and 832.
Thanks for the kind words. I appreciate that. I would also tell everyone to have a little patience. This has only been the first draw! The number of invitations issued will increase in subsequent draw and the points will vary significantly as well. I'm a bit blown away by the fact that ONLY 779 people scored 886 or higher! Looking at Canada's immigration targets for 2015, there is no possible way they will ever meet their numbers if they are only drawing people with LMIAs. I think this could end up being a very good sign to be honest.cheesycheese said:...so, in the short term, without an LMIA you've got no chance.
rjessome, I've only been on this forum for a few days but already, I know your posts are the diamonds in the haystack.
Thank you!
Sorry, can't share a profile. Confidentiality rules.bj291 said:Your candidates without those 600 pts would have really struggled to get anything but they might be def. picked up in next round. I am wondering your client who only managed 754....if you deduct 600 for lmia and may be 100 for age then he scored only 186 on other factors such as ielts, education or skills transferability section which is really weird. Do you mind sharing the profile as in which noc they are applying and what is their education, ielts?
Well... My score fluctuates due to one confusion...rjessome said:Sorry, can't share a profile. Confidentiality rules.
sachinleo80 said:Well... My score fluctuates due to one confusion...
I have 3 degrees - B.Sc, B.Ed and M.Sc and following is my ECA result -
1. B.Sc - 3 Years Graduation degree
2. B.Ed - Bachelor in Education
3. M.Sc - 4 Years Graduation degree (In conjunction with B.Sc degree)
Now my question is - In my application under section "Studies", can I select my M.Sc degree (which is mentioned as 4 years graduation according to Canadian degree) as "Two or more degrees.... "?
Your response is much appreciated. Thanks much!
I think what some people are forgetting is that the CIC is backlogged with paper applications that go a few years back. They are still processing these and they will count towards the target numbers for immigration each year. I am sure they have enough old paper based applications alone to meet their targets for the next two years. I suspect they are only going to allow a small number of EE applications in until they catch up on the old applications. They are basically slowing the flow of applications without cutting it off completely (this means only letting the best of the best to apply) until they take care of the backlog. I think its more likely to see old application processing times speed up over the next few years but very few people will be given ITA.rjessome said:Thanks for the kind words. I appreciate that. I would also tell everyone to have a little patience. This has only been the first draw! The number of invitations issued will increase in subsequent draw and the points will vary significantly as well. I'm a bit blown away by the fact that ONLY 779 people scored 886 or higher! Looking at Canada's immigration targets for 2015, there is no possible way they will ever meet their numbers if they are only drawing people with LMIAs. I think this could end up being a very good sign to be honest.
Exactly, this is one of the top most reasons.Mbgirlfriend said:I think what some people are forgetting is that the CIC is backlogged with paper applications that go a few years back. They are still processing these and they will count towards the target numbers for immigration each year. I am sure they have enough old paper based applications alone to meet their targets for the next two years. I suspect they are only going to allow a small number of EE applications in until they catch up on the old applications. They are basically slowing the flow of applications without cutting it off completely (this means only letting the best of the best to apply) until they take care of the backlog. I think its more likely to see old application processing times speed up over the next few years but very few people will be given ITA.
I don't want to seem negative but I think its best to be realistic and realize that a new system takes time to work the way it is intended to work. I wouldn't be surprised if the number of ITA is this low for at least a year.
This is a big reason why my BF just sent in his PNP application by paper. He may also create an EE profile but since he doesn't have ECA's and it would take too long to get it (his PNP would expire by the time he got the EAC) so his score would drop significantly. He may still get in with the PNP nomination but I don't think that is even a for sure thing judging by the scores that did make it.