Not possible. Tr to Pr pathway has got no timeline so there is no case to argue....its not like other programs that hv a timeline.
Although I won't be the one to take this to court because I have received my PR, I believe that there is an argument to be made in a court, if a good lawyer was willing to pursue it, that there is definitely an intended and/or implied service standard for the TR2PR program despite the fact that it is not stated in the TR to PR policy or guidelines. The following is an excerpt from a letter I wrote to CBC:
"Before the pathway opened, it was informally promoted in live presentations made by IRCC staff to immigration firms & representatives as a ‘quick’ pathway to permanent residence, but since then it has retroactively been referred to as a “pathway with no stated service standard so please stop calling us &/or writing us." This is the answer that applicants who have been waiting for almost 2 years get from call centre agents and MPs alike. It's a very poor
read-the-fine-print-oh-wait-there-is-none kind of answer. In truth, there is no stated service standard in the policy, however, there is an implied 6-month to 1-year standard in that the ‘TR to PR Pathway’ is considered part of the Economic class, and deep inside IRCC’s website there are performance tables from 2021 that have headings actually stating a 6-month standard. Also, it is counter-intuitive that IRCC would deliberately want to reward essential workers and try to meet their own immediate post-Covid immigration catch-up goals by launching an indefinite/protracted program."
I have raised the above with several agents when I got the 'there is no service standard' answer and their responses have been "um" or "unfortunately that's all we know." Sadly, they are ill-equipped to provide answers beyond what they are told.
Best wishes!