Search results

what is OP? :-)

He is immigration lawyer so it is hard to argue when they know more than me. I went to 2 immigration consultants and one lawyer and they told me same thing.

i understand and thanks for all the reply negative or positive. These comments actually helped me understand a lot of things. I'm been reading a lot of cases almost same as mine and really 99% the outcome it not favorable. As my lawyer told me, cases are different to each other, maybe some...

Thanks Bud. That's what we actually put on our reply letter with addition documents. we admit it was an honest mistake and we can prove it.

yep, if denied based on misrepresentation then no appeal for my wife but i'm positive that they will look at the paper not because of misrepresentation but rather on a different point of view so we won't get that 5 years ban.

i went to the lawyer and told us it is not representation. The letter from CIC didn't say anything about i misrepresent something on our application. They just want clarification because they were confused on the details we provided. It was an honest mistake and if we can provide a detailed...

I don’t want argue but man you trying to tell me i don’t have hope. I’m not afraid of investigation because i not hiding anything. I know that simple mistake is big mistake and will probably effect us negatively but as this point based on other trends, we just need to wait for decision then we...

What do you suggest then? At this point, it all waiting time at all speculation. They might consider misrepresentation or they might not. I have full trust on the immigration system of this country and hopefully it is favorable to us. If not, then i can fight in the court. I understand all of...

I think it is better for them to investigate because they can find out that we are telling the truth. Their investigation will clear everything up.

There i just need to be positive rather than overthinking this. I’m ok that my wife will be denied as long as it is not because of misrepresentation bec we can have a lots of avenues to go. Cheers!

We sent our reply already so hopefully they will consider our explanation. Without the word misrepresentation on the letter gave me hope for a better result. I will just stay positive

Well, i read again the letter from CIC and it didn't say anything about misrepresentation. It only say that i didn't meet the regulation 125(1)(d) therefore i'm not eligible to sponsor. As per my immigration agent, it is not misrepresentation. a false alarm :-)

of course with the correct documents lol

hopefully, we can get an appeal so we can verbally explain to them the truth.

Nice to hear some positive comment here. i should have included my taxes too that proves i was single. i think i can easily prove about being single before i get my PR but the only problem is the date on the common law declaration which is really wrong. Anyway, i will just hope for the best.

I understand but people who are telling the truth should be consider as long as the can produce papers that would explain that they made an honest mistake. Honest mistake and people who are trying to make fraudulent application should not be treated the same.

well, that is a bad luck then when you trying to be truthful but they will use it against you. That is not the Canadian way to do things. i been here in Canada for 8 year and i love their values and what they stand for.

We already sent our reply on the fairness letter. With all the good replies i got here, i think we will just wait for the decision and get a lawyer to tell us the next step to go.

Inland application

Thanks Bud.