+1(514) 937-9445 or Toll-free (Canada & US) +1 (888) 947-9445

Search results

  1. S

    All those applicants applied under old system(before Feb,2008)

    i do not know if the minister is going to keep physicians, lawyers in the new list but what is clear is that the minister admits that his fast track is a total disaster doctors do everything in canada from driving taxis,trucks,security to delivering pizzas but 90% will never work as doctors...
  2. S

    No More Litigants accepted to Sue CIC-An email by Tim Leahy

    its like one books a holiday with a tour operater and it rains on the day of the tour and people moan, "hey i booked this tour and it rained so i want my money back"
  3. S

    No More Litigants accepted to Sue CIC-An email by Tim Leahy

    you must be joking a non-descript lawyer will charge anything upwards of $5,000 to go the honorable court and the reputed ones charge 8,000-10,000$ (that is if you go to file the case as an individual and not as a group)
  4. S

    No More Litigants accepted to Sue CIC-An email by Tim Leahy

    who created the misery in the first place if cic had processed the applications ....... no litigation then when the litigation was filed, the cic did what? dismiss the pre-feb away to moot the litigation so who created this situation again? cic and as per some people on the other forum the...
  5. S

    No More Litigants accepted to Sue CIC-An email by Tim Leahy

    wrong mate even if pre-feb is legislated away there are many applicants who are not dismissed among the litigants and fall within the 20,000 spared the axe the case will still go ahead and the class action suit is inevitable
  6. S

    No More Litigants accepted to Sue CIC-An email by Tim Leahy

    in one of your posts you say that the litigation has failed miserably and now you want people to help him win the case?
  7. S

    BREAKING NEWS - Canadian Government Slashes Backlog

    what you are talking about is basic "common sense" this is a skill also in shortage in canada and mostly in cic if you have this skill just watch out for MI-4 NOC list or alternatively look under rocket science category
  8. S

    2005 Applicants - New Delhi

    please stop spreading rumours
  9. S

    Backlog Reduction- Act now.

    regarding litigation your comments tantmounts to spreading rumours
  10. S

    2005-2006 (New Delhi) applicants

    spreading rumours and unsubstantiated claims is the last thing this issue needs
  11. S

    BREAKING NEWS - Canadian Government Slashes Backlog

    no point in writing to the ministers...... it will not work..... you do not vote and so you donot matter they are least bothered about human rights or what is unfair/injustice to applicants the minister has support of the prime minister and enjoy majority in parliament for making the law to...
  12. S

    BREAKING NEWS-----Canadian Government Slashes Backlog

    the wording of the text says that you "meet the selection criteria of the program" and it does not say a positive selection decision (SELDEC on caips) has been made on your application when the immigration officer assesses your file allots points for the qualifying criteria and gives you a...
  13. S

    BREAKING NEWS-----Canadian Government Slashes Backlog

    Q4. What does a "decision based on selection criteria" mean? A "decision based on selection criteria" means that an immigration officer: has assessed your FSW application against the points grid, and has made a decision on whether or not you meet the selection criteria of the program...
  14. S

    FUTURE OF 2004 APPLICANTS GETTING PR

    there is a high probability that the backlog cases will either be legislated away ie dismissed by making a law or alternatively new point system will be applied to dismiss most of them the first scenario a new law is needed and for the second a mere notification to apply new criteria with...
  15. S

    WWIC s Ask To Pay 700 $ TO PREJUNE APPLICANTS for FILING court case aganist CIC

    what will be interesting is if CIC dismisses the backlog applications by law or by fiddeling with the points to the disadvantage of the applicants what will be interesting is if CIC will make innocent applicants scapegoats for its flawed policies in the name of modernising immigration system...
  16. S

    BACKLOGGERS LITIGATION

    dear Khalidhaider the "others" in my post refer to the non-litigants who have faith in the CIC to process their files and want to wait you seem to have missed the irony in the post
  17. S

    BACKLOGGERS LITIGATION

    unfortunately "others" may not get the opportunity to wait..... it is most likely the backlog will be dismissed without being processed
  18. S

    Immigration backlog could be erased, Kenney suggests

    what constitutes backlog according to the minister any application before pre-feb2008 is backlog according to logic MI-1 applicants are also in backlog category (since many NOC were eliminated in 29 list and are no more "in-demand") although the minister blames the previous liberal govt for...
  19. S

    Immigration backlog could be erased, Kenney suggests

    well your post may not be insensitive but is certainly inconsiderate what "noon" is highligting is a flawed policy which lacked transparency and is highly unfair and unjustified how is that a dentist who applied 2004 no good for immigration but one who applied under MI-2/MI-3 becomes more in-demand
  20. S

    Immigration backlog could be erased, Kenney suggests

    well sir pmm your comments are always valuable and appreciated..... but this time i regret to write that i diagree with you. your opinion is that backlog applicants skills are not marketable..... for your information there are doctors, dentists, nurses etc in the backlog which the minister...