Search results

Yes. It applies to all as the judge will announce the law constitutaional or unconstitutional. If in our favour the judge will strike down the law.

It seems that it is the government certified response. Even the minister does not understand what he says to justify his sick decisions.

Hopefully victory is imminent.

There is a say: Winter goes by but the darkness and black colour remains for charcoal. These days will be over soon. Human being is alive with hope, moving out of Africa spreading around the world with nothing just real hope.

We live in 21st century and we are entitled to take any government to court treating illegally by not processing our files they promissed to process. Old days of governments around the world doing what they want illegaly are over. But some still think it is 18th century. The move by the...

++

Wonderful and brilliant.

Looking the matter even pessimistic that people outside Canada are not entitled to be protected by constitution ,proving that the law descriminated even one person inside Canada is sufficient to announce the 87.4 is illegal and all the cases will be reopen.

Excellent. That's correct some of affected applicants already reside in Canada and they are discriminated by the law. Nothing is final but I think the chance of victory in the lawsuit is more than losing (not 100%) as the judge will decide whether section 87.4 is legal or not.

The canadian constitution should not be applied to everybody in the world but shlould be applied to people who are dealing with Canadian government in legal processes created by their own government (Immigration). I repeat applicants to Newzealand did the same in 2003 as we do now and they were...

Thanks. We will be happy on the day verdict comes out: If the rulling is in our favour , demonstrates our thoughts were right. If the rulling is not in our favour meaning that the government can do anything by passing a law in parliament no matter what the constitution says. Just forget about...

Constitution Act, 1982 (80) 1982, c.11 (UK), Schedule B, Part I MOBILITY RIGHTS Marginal note:Mobility of citizens 6. (1) Every citizen of Canada has the right to enter, remain in and leave Canada. Marginal note:Rights to move and gain livelihood (2) Every citizen of Canada and every person...

There are rare (if not no) cases with governments being successful in such lawsuits. The same happened in 2002 for Canadians when the court dissmised the government arguemnets for applying new passmark (75) retroactively. The same in Nz, Just search the web. We didn't apply to immigrate to...

The applicants are not in Canada but the minister is there and the constitution is applied to him. For exapmle a Canadian doctor can't prescribe marijuana for a person with mental disorder living outside Canada saying negative things to attract other's attention (for example one in this forum)...

Another evidence of a person with mental disorder, as bad as a story of an alone person seeking other's attention by saying negative things.

There is no timeframe for the ruling but it is expected in 2 to 4 weeks from now.

Dear friends just listen to the youtube video (the link posted on bellissimolawgroup website) Mario D. Bellissimo Says that they expect the department of justice (the government lawyers) deliver their certified docs by Friday 25th of January ,not the verdict. They expect the verdict in coming...