Search results

Exactly, I must give a point to the neighbor part. This is no joke. In my country, we have many cases where somebody graduate from a top-notch foreign language school and tumble into security pitfall, the reason? Many of his/her alumni are diplomats! we are living in quite a different world...

Me too, what we should worry about is not BC anymore, we are talking about security screening, that is serious business. Had I been given a second chance, I would've stayed put and been a choir boy that CIC truly favors.

Don't go anywhere fifty miles beyond your hometown, don't study any hi-tech or foreign affairs related college majors, stick with your first job in a local family enterprise since graduation, be an entry-level programmer/accountant/clergy all your life, then your file will be crystal clear and...

sorry didn't get you . you mean in the case of this guy , his file was not looked in depth hence some agencies are not involved?

Haha, This I didn't realize , it's a real classic! God bless we are not living in the fantasy of an infinite loop.

Good listening is finally out and now. Yes， but January is not February, check their timeline, each step is progressing way faster. February is where most PNP cases got stuck. February is a whole new ball game.

I'll say it's no where near that figure

Carefully read Falcon's thread on floor 6980 and 6984, although I am still wondering the same what's the complication soliciting provincial document, but afterall they have their own mechanism we are in no position of questioning, and the provinces are indeed busy this year. It's a plausible...

If PNP is not a privilege, at least Don't let it be the underprivileged.:) Are there better ways to verify the provincial document?Can they be automatically shared and made readily available at hand when needed? Hope things can go faster afterwards, Been a long time since the last major...

Understood. So the notes only show what's been done, as for the things not done, we can not draw conclusions as to the real reason, whether they're waiting in line, or they are not needed...

Falcon, while your theory of initial provincial document verification is plausible, but this year backup evidences from numerous extracted notes say that they don't even cast an eye over our cases for the initial several months. If they are truly verifying with the province, will the notes show...

Thank you ! i'll study this one, your article here is truly inspiring.

ok makes some sense , but honestly don't see the complication verifying nominations, since they are in the government system and each one has a unique number, it's like the IELTS score , not something you can buy from some certificate forgers in a third world street corner.

yeah , but we are talking about federal stage of pnp cases after ITA, excluding the provincial cycle, how can this take way longer than fsw?

yeah yours is slow among fsw, maybe some case by case concern ? but big data shows most pnp cases won't even get mep for months, while they already giving out ppr to April fsw. i'm curious is this legitimate SOP? isn't this a first came first served matter?

yes ,before there is a wide known notion that pnp are quicker, because those cases already went through several months of check and inspection by province.

with this trend going on , it's safe to say 80% feb. cases won't get approved by August.

why do they hold up PNP stream cases so long ? right now almost all the febuary cases which got PPR are fsw or cec, and we even see April fsw cases got approved, while pnp cases of the same time don't even get a mep.

In this case I can simply arrange to have it produced while waiting for the CIC decision, this hint is real helpful, Thank you indeed Nessa!