Search results

That's what i've been saying for a while . Now they all want to tattoo this bill , and please people , please , do not rely on those tweets nor place hopes on them . We've been tricked more than once . Here is the story of what happened : First of all , when Sen Omidvar ( Sponsor ) said...

You took it out of my mouth . ;D

Now , I can assure you , i will all offer you a coffee/tea should it be different , There is NO WAY in any circumstances this bill will pass by May . The HoC WON'T accept all those changes : Age requirement , minors applicants , fair process .. who knows what tomorrow and we know now that...

don't think it will pass ,otherwise like you said the Hoc will reject it , there is no doubt about it . At the minute , an amendment is to modify a bill in its present , no government( whatever the party) will allow it . The revocation amendment was a add-on on bill c6 not a modification on...

vote for the amendment on language ? ( sorry not following the session )

Sen McCoy presented her amendment on march 8th or 9th if i'm not mistaken ( almost a month ago) , approved on April 4th , that includes the 2 weeks vacation . Don't need to see what will happen with this amendment and the "many more" to come . IF they don't force a vote before the break , and...

anyone joining me on creating a twitter account ?

Yes but there all the other amendments will be refused by the HOC . Dropping the fees , never going to happen . Language requirements , they are touching the bill itself on its form , they will never accept that, compared to the fair process part where it was not covered by this bill ...

They are calming people down with those false hopes tweets , passed before easter ..they were aware of those coming up unless they were high on something ..it was just an april fools day prank NOT presenting all the amendments at committee stage was the biggest/stupidest mistake ever made , but...

No datas , no numbers ... and still manage to have time to laugh.

if this bill is so flawed , why don't they just throw it in the trash . Today it is language and age , at committee they settled that question , the proportion of people where language skills have not been assessed during the pr process , is very LOW .. the people concerned to this are the one...

What i'm trying to understand is : After all this time , since the bill returned from committee , they decided to introduce amendments NOW .Especially coming from the independents ..Honestly , they are messing around . A bill will NEVER be perfect for every single situation . Those amendments...

Good post ...avoiding a thousand question post royal assent , should this bill pass though +1

It is the only option in the cons'hands at this stage , putting this bill to sleep . If they introduce amendments , it is total chaos for this bill. Any hopes will be burned I still don't understand why she post it if it wasn't true though :-\

pure speculation my friend . If nothing happens to that bill tomorrow , you'll have the trend until summer break.

Politicians and their promises ::) They said it would pass before canada day 2016 , then before January 2017 , a couple of weeks before they said before july 2017 now before easter . People want actions period. They'd better actually start taking actions because don't get me wrong but Sen...

+1

that would be probably true , once the 3/5 rule kicks in , processing times may increase , however one must reminder that with c24 , the government has cut useless steps on the process , now the whole assessment is straight forward and applications won't move after being received by local...

tomorrow one of them will come with stupid things , such as the one being revoked his citizenship must receive an email as well , that is not legal.

i can barely imagine what will happen at third reading ... :-X