Search results

That's why they should do their best to push it ASAP. Amendments were introduced at a very stupid timing, and voting in favour of these amendments will just mean more delays.

Let's not waste time and resources and trigger more lengthy discussions over a ridiculous matter. Definitely language requirement should be there.

People like you are the main motive for delaying C-6. You are just concerned about delaying YOUR applications when opening the gate for floods of applications as you claim. You don't care about others being screwed for just pushing your files fly smoothly.

It is obvious that the delay is planned for, the proposed amendments were the last episode

No I was not a citizen last year but I will be by next year, and I will not vote to a party that is playing with my life

Please add me to the list and a couple of tens of thousands of immigrants. Libs will lose a lot by delaying this bill more

What so ever GREAT amendments are, it is not the right time to introduce them. Need a SEPARATE bill

+++++ Agree. This is the only way that amendments (i.e. delays) would make sense in this critical timing, otherwise, they should forget about the amendments now and introduce them separately.

If the Liberal and independent senators want to show the least consideration to the majority of immigrants who suffered from the previous government, they should defeat amendments at this point

What is her point of imposing amendments RIGHT NOW? after we were almost there?

Any attempt to impose ANY KIND OF AMENDMENTS at this stage is another NASTY TACTIC TO DELAY BILL C-6. Amendments are important and critical, yes we all agree. BUT due to the sensitivity of these amendments which touch a serious matter like citizenship revocation, AMENDMENTS SHOULD BE INTRODUCED...