Search results

@Bhumi in Canada, why are you worried bro, saw your comments in another thread too. It is worthwhile to note that being you anxious and commenting on thread won't really help, it's a process buddy

Folks just don't raise the webforms until the processing time is exhausted, as that will hinder the process. Yesterday my eligibility started, and now the only thing awaiting is final decision (which I think is delayed due to webforms raised by me)

My eligibility started yesterday, so hopefully some decision will be there today or this week I applied October 19, biometrics - October 26, so currently its 12-13 days after the biometrics

No kamali, do you?

By correspondence letter you mean the BVL, and the study permit number you can see in tracker only right?

I was about to apply on the new portal, but the Proof of Funds got me, and as in SDS we don't show the funds, but I applied on GCKey and later somebody told me its tuition fees Yeah I know there are no IMM forms on the new one, only question answers taken in starting, I had everything ready too...

Maybe little off topic here, is New portal (ircc one) better than old (gckey) for SDS?

Do we know if we can get PPR on Sunday or IRCC works on their weekends

Tracker doesn't update immediately, it takes 1 or 2 days after GCKey is updated

Nope, what about you

Title enough

Thanks rcincanada2019

yes I do

I know it won't help, but curious me wants to find out if any downsides to that

I've kept an auto-reload of 6 minutes to avoid session timeout on GCKey, but in an hour or two it still logs out saying the session is invalid/expired. Does keeping GCKey open always, affect IRCC in anyway while processing/updating our application

Hey, did you get your PPR now?

Got it, thanks canuck78

I think it's Background verification letter, that RCMP has verified your biometrics are all ok

LUCK

Yeah, you explained neatly, but as they say secondary OR post-secondary, and post-secondary means undergraduate right, if they wanted secondary transcripts strictly then they should have included AND instead of OR for postgrad applicants