Recent content by armoured

Yeah, if it were me, I'd do a terrible job ).

It sounds to me like they're identical in the main except for, you know, the dimensionality required for a 'back'. The physical is a sort of beige and I can't see the gradient well enough from the scan to say - so the colour scheme and that kind of thing may be different. Anyway, it sounds like...

Do you consider colour a special feature? I only have a scan as I was asked to do that. I don't recall in detail the rest. If it has special features, it's nothing as elaborate as the passport biopages. I do recall the front page is a b**** to scan in blakc and white, it has a complex...

Go ahead and try that if you wish. You hadn't mentioned the child is in Canada.

For family member: starts with a K. Also has barcodes at the bottom (for both certificate # and date of birth). I wrote somewhere here recently that I thought they would do exactly this: that the 'paper' certificates would be accepted in copy because clearly they'd been designed for digital...

A new exam will be needed, even if it were the right type (I don't know the difference), the results are generally only considered good for one year.

I don't think it should effect AOR at all (as long as the three years before were ticked appropriately, anyway). It's more in the requirements later. To be clear, for AOR stage, I think they are only checking that indeed the boxes are ticked as required - which for online I think it checks that...

I'll leave to the side why you might feel that I specifically need reminding of that... Agree. I just don't believe this is that case. This is the government reminding Canadians of the limitations on helping them abroad. Canadians in different circumstances face different risks and challenges...

No way for us to tell you. IRCC may ask you to re-sit the test in different conditions. Just wait and see what happens - you'll either see the test clear as approved or get an email.

Here's the text for others: Yes. I quoted from it too. No, it does not give me the impression duals are second-class citizens. So much so that I do not understand how you got that impression. It's a neutral, factual text kept simple for reading. Okay. I agree with this. But again: any...

All sounds correct. Just follow the instructions and you'll be fine.

This is not answering my question. Specifically, where does it say this is required? For someone who already has a WP visa and has not yet arrived in Canada. 'You would need' is not the answer. 1) If there is no written, specific requirement to update, then there is no misrepresentation - see...

I don't exclude that it's possible there are some; I just don't have any information supporting the contention that it happens a lot. My suspicion - gut feeling - is that to the extent there are any, they may be based on some really outrageous set of facts; either true outliers, or perhaps some...

To be clear and specific, here is the statement that I called hogwash: You've made a blanket statement here that the Charter doesn't apply to Quebec. That is complete and utter hogwash, full on and undiluted. I think some of your other rather broad statements bordered on hogwash, for...

I want to be clear and specific about this, because I tried to phrase it as a question: are you saying they 'should' change their status to married in a general sense, or is it required? Does the work permit holder receive correspondence informing them that they must inform IRCC if they get...