You said you don't understand what my point is. Meaning, after reading all the posts I wrote and you replied to, you admit that you have no idea what you were replying to, or what my point is. After all this time further attempt to explain myself would be futile. Clearly, you have diffculty understanding written English, or you are just trolling me (and I will not teach you English nor cotninue to respond to trolling messages).
I am not trying to troll you. Still trying to understand your intentions behind all the words you wrote above. And as long as you can understand my words, I don't mind writing bad English or even learn English from you. I can also use Google translate if I am not able to understand your fine English.
So, you are actually not interested in discussing the subject, but are interested in discussing my intentions and my persona. Like most people who can't argue their points on merits, you are resorting to ad hominems, it is a last straw of all demagogues.
Not your persona, only intention. I wanted to discuss the subject and asked you thrice what was your point. If you are unwilling to discuss that, then I tried to understand what you want to discuss on this forum (hence the intention). That would be the logical way.
Don't know about PNP, can't comment.
Agreed.
Not suggesting it's easy, especially projecting something into future based on current needs and market conditions. However, if after years of large influx of immigrants it's clear that there is no scarcity of their labor and no need to bring them in numbers they are being imported, one would think it's no brainer to reduce or stop further influx, until market absorbs those who are already present in Canada. What we see instead? Increase of immigration flow. Why act contrary to common sense and do what we already know will deliver adverse results? The only reason you would do this if you were serving exclusively large corporations, to the exclusion of ordinary citizens and immigrants. Because, latter are the ones who suffer. But corporations benefit, by having a huge pool of workers competing with each other and so desperate that you can hire the lowest bidder and leave everyone else high and dry.
They are free to do that, the beauty of PR status is the freedom it gives (unline non-immigrant H1b visa in the US). And those individuals, how they choose to settle and where to work, are not my concern. I am most of all concerned about MBAs or IT spesialists or analysts, with years of experience working in a large French, german, Indian or US corporation, arriving to Canada and not finding anything better than a shift at local warehouse. We know there are a lot of those people among landed PRs.
If you had any current knowledge you would know that IT specialist have no problem getting jobs in Canada at the moment. Individual with MBA is dependent on their field. MBA is now a common degree and where you received your MBA will play a big factor. Within Canadian graduates it is a deciding factor. If you attend Rotman or Ivey your chances of securing a job on Bay Street are much better than most other MBAs. There are labour shortages but as someone immigrating you Canada it is your job to see if your skills are needed in Canada. Canada has too many pharmacists and dentists. A simple google or reaching out to current dentists or pharmacists in Canada wil tell you that salaries are decreasing in those industries and jobs can be difficult to find. Shortages are in more remote/rural regions. I see many working in Finance wanting to relocate to Canada from various countries plus others currently working in HK and UK due to uncertainty in the country. This is on top of Canadians working in finance abroad wanting to return home. Canada is a small market. Anyone in finance knows this and would know they can only absorb so many workers coming from abroad. Many live in the fantasy that they will be the lucky one who will secure a top finance job in Canada. It is not up to Canada to do all your research and to determine if immigrating is the best thing for you to do. If you want to relocate to another city in Canada you do lots of research to determine if it the right decision. Same as a Canadian if you go work abroad or apply to immigrate to another country. You do your research to determine if it makes sense to immigrate. You keep on mentioning that new immigrants are willing to move anywhere for a good job but that isn’t true based on my experience on the ground.
No argument there. Besides, I try to keep a sight of the big picture. When I say "doctors pull rickshaws" I don't literally mean "Every single one of Canadian PRs are doctors by profession, and every single one of them is pulling a rickshaw". What I mean is that someone with professional degree, experience and credentials is forced to accept an unskilled job, or a job far below his qualifications, credentials and experience. I use these words in proverbial sense. So, in reality it could be anyone in any field/specialty with skills/experience that qualified them for PR, but ended up doing something not requiring more than a high school degree or BA in liberal arts. I believe I already explained this before, when you were arguing with me about too few doctors driving an Uber in Canada.
To sum it up, if you graduate from Harvard Law School you may start your career at one of the banks on Wall Street. We all know this, it's nothing new (or pertinent to Canada only) and, most importantly, is irrelevant to crux of our discussion.
Leave my job out of it. It's not my job to decide if 200,000 or 400,000 or 800,000 skilled immigrants will immigrate to Canada in 2023 or 2025.
I think you either intentionally or unintentionally misinterpret what I am saying. I am not disputing that there is shortage of all those jobs in Canada. Nor do I dispute that there are too many people coming to Canada, while its job market is too small to absorb all those people. In fact. I am stating that too many people are admitted to Canada and competing for jobs where there is no scarcity of workers, but scarcity of jobs. So, what are you arguing about?
The government does study how many people they should let immigrate every year. They don’t pull a number out of a hat. It isn’t the government’s responsibility to ensure that you find your ideal job in Canada or to ensure that you find a similar job you had in your home country. There is personally responsibility involved. When attending university or college you look at the job market and try to identify if you’ll be able to find work when you graduate or will the degree give you the skills needed to find a job. The government doesn’t do that for you. Most new graduates take jobs that may not be in their field to gain experience in the workforce. Canadians wanting to switch jobs look at the job market in various cities across Canada. They don’t expect the gvt to do the work for them.
Let me rewrite your statement as below:
She has a difficult job of being a voice of government propaganda on this forum. She can't engage in a straightforward discussion of the subject matter, she must constantly change the subject and make straw man arguments, like others who don't care about human cost of federal government policies that aim to please large corporations. Large corporations are the only beneficiaries of dirt cheap labor, which becomes available by oversaturation of job market and willful import of hundreds of thousands of skilled workers that Canadian job market has no capacity to absorb.
Anyone who disagrees with this "expert" is either a troll, or voice of govt propaganda or making straw man arguments. The "expert" has very strong opinions but never presents data to back it up, has never really lived in Canada but has read articles and seen videos to gain the "expertise" on Canada. The same trend and words repeated across multiple threads.
Your argurement on oversaturation is a hyperbole at best. Doctors driving cabs is not because there are no jobs, but because they failed to understand the licensing requirements, which every developed country has. Search "doctors driving cabs in US" and first article is from Reuters.
