Well said, very well said. I feel there needs to be a balance though; where people whose lives have been on hold because of the commitments they made towards achieving the Canadian dreams aren't completely ignored. As I have mentioned here a while back, once you start this journey, you're 100% committed to it. How about understanding this and somehow, find a way to do what works for all the parties involved? A pause of almost two years for some isn't considerate. Funnily, many of these so called "high-skilled" immigrants settle for these survival jobs in their first year - thereabout. So you aren't exactly losing anything by bringing them into the country to fill these shortages, gaps or what have you in the "low-skilled" realm on a temporary basis. I believe this would give most the needed "Canadian experience" which is kind of important to most employers within Canada.
People aren't against making the people who's found their ways into the country to stay, we are just agitated that they are staying at the detriment of our own arrivals. I personally don't care how many of the "low skilled" immigrants get to become PR, I just want to get this PR journey sorted so I can start the next phase of my life.
Hope you understand the sentiments?
I can say few things. IRCC is NOT the best of the Canadian organization, far from it, it is the worst. From the looks of it, it is by design. It gets the LEAST funding because it does not yield votes. It is a government department and NOT a crown enterprise. That means, ALL the money that it gets (from processing fees, fines), it does not get to keep it, they are taken up by federal government. Federal government allocates it funds and since it is not a vote generating head, the funds are usually shoe string. Compare this to crown enterprise like BC transit. For those in India it is difference between SBI and your local police station. Hence, all the slow processing etc. Immigration has not been a monetary priority for Canada ever. In that context, I humbly believe, the changes will be minimal to the situation. Though there have been few positive policy changes for prospective immigrants, ATIP access will now be not limited to those physically in Canada to say the least.
Now coming to the other point of "Canadian Dream". Well, at the risk of appearing as a self indulgent prick and an "arsehole", let me share you my own experience with immigration in two countries. First is Australia, for which I had PR since 2015. During those years, I tried to get a job in Australia before landing there. That did not happen (or shall I say did not happen well enough). So, I never landed there (beside a brief visit to activate my PR). Next I joined a company with major global operation and a corporate policy of supporting immigration. I first arrived in Canada on a WP. So I had my job lined up before I even landed. PR comes next. I dont claim this is the "best" way. Nor do I know if I will be successful in becoming a PR but I know this. I was usually not in a financial hurry due to having a job in Canada all the times. Ofcourse, my Australian "dream" did not panned out. Too risky to venture. I believe immigration should not be primarily a "risk taking" venture, UNLESS risks home are massive (like breakdown of law and order or war or similar). Fortunately, for me that was not the case and I recognise that for some of us, that may be the situation. Yet for a lot of those who are jumping into immigration head first need to revaluate their risk profile. First take a Work Permit and stay in Canada and then apply for PR, IMHO. Lastly, always keep and maintain you job and employability. That is prime.