Hi can anyone help me to review my GCMS notes? any thing to worry about ? Thanks in Advance!
NOTES
NOTES: 1
Created Date: 2020/11/19 10:58:40
Created By: DM01333
Updated Date: 2020/11/19 10:59:19
Updated By: DM01333
Restricted: No
Label: General
Office: Centralized Intake Office
Text:
REVIEW TYPE: A11.2 - CASE PROCESSING AGENT APPLICATION: XXXXXX REGULATION: PNP: FSW,
2020-09-25 I have reviewed this application based upon the documents submitted by the applicant and the
information contained in the file and note the following. RECOMMENDATION:***Review REQUIRED by Officer***
*** Please Review information regarding refusal in notes ** Please Review Funds A11.2: REVIEW REQUIRED
R87: REVIEW REQUIRED R75: REVIEW REQUIRED R76: Selection Criteria - FSW POINTS: APPEARS TO MEET
R76: Selection Criteria - FUNDS: REVIEW REQUIRED MEDICAL: ALL VALID Ready to Finalize
______________________ PNP NOMINATION: - Province of Nomination: MB.
- PNC#: 2063818. - Province matches current residence: Yes. - Nomination validity: Original. - Case Type:
Economic Case. - Schedule 4 on file: Yes. _____________________ _
Comprehensive Ranking System (CRS) CRS Score at invitation to apply (ITA) 996 CRS points minimum score
for round: 475 CRS score at application (APR): 996 Total CRS Points Assessed: 996 I have reviewed the
following for CRS points: and MARRIED at APR PA gained points as at ITA PA gained points for 3+ year(s)
Foreign Work Experience with XXXXXXX ON edoc# 393758129 *Skill Transferability* 050-
Foreign Work Experience - Verified EDUCATION
CREDENTIAL(S) PROVIDED Bachelor's Degree, XXXXXXX R75(2)(A) PRIMARY OCCUPATION: NOC XXXX
XXXXXX WORK EXPERIENCE 1: Foreign XXXXX (NOC: XXX) for XXXXXX
XXXXX R75(2) LETTER OF EMPLOYMENT (eDoc# 393758129 Dated: 2020-09-16 Job Description
consistent with lead statement and main duties of declared NOC - YES
______________________ FSW POINTS: APPEARS TO MEET FSW score at
ITA: 73/ Min required FSW Score: 67 Total FSW Points Assessed: 73 11 - R80 Work Experience - Verified 05-
R83 Adaptability - Verified Spouse has language Proficiency PNP Triage: Refer to IR
______________________ Family Composition: NO CONCERNS PA
(XXXX, XXX), MARRIED Marriage certificate is on file PASSPORT EXPIRY: 2029-03-12 SPOUSE/CL (XXX,
XXX), ACCOMPANYING PASSPORT EXPIRY: 2029-03-10 DEP 1 (XXX, XXX, born: 2014-04-22,
age at lock-in date: 6), ACCOMPANYING Birth cert.: PA and Spouse listed as parents PASSPORT EXPIRY:
2027-10-22 DEP 2 (XXXX, XXXX, born: 2018-08-16, age at lock-in date: 2), ACCOMPANYING Birth cert.: PA and
Spouse listed as parents PASSPORT EXPIRY: 2023-09-03
____________________ INTEGRATED SEARCH (FOSS/GCMS): PA
(XXXX, XXX) In Status - TRV Valid Until: 2029-03-11 NO ADVERSE INFORMATION SPOUSE/CL (SAlT,
MOHAMED RIYAZ) No trace in GCMS/FOSS other than present application DEP 1 (XX, XXX) No trace in
GCMS/FOSS other than present application DEP 2 (XXX, XXX) No trace in GCMS/FOSS other than present
Application
NOTES: 4
Created Date: 2020/11/03 07:57:38
Created By: KR8850
Updated Date: 2020/11/0307:57:53
Updated By: KR8850
Restricted: No
Request Identifier: A-2021-04933
Requested Date: 03/09/2021
Label: EE Eligibility
Office: Centralized Intake Office
Text:
REVIEW TYPE: Program Assistant APPLICATION #: XXXX REGULATION: PNP I have reviewed this
application based upon the documents submitted by the applicant and the information contained in the file and
note the following. MIN.SCORE: 475 CRS SCORE: 996 Principal Applicant Application Promoted: Existing UCI
Spouse Application Promoted: Existing UCI Dep 1 Application Promoted: Existing UCI Dep 2 Application
Promoted: Existing UCI SP: Statutory details located in separate GCMS note Primary Applicant Medical
Attached to UCI: Yes Spouse Medical Attached to UCI: Yes Dep 1 Medical Attached to UCI: Yes Dep 2 Medical
Attached to UCI: Yes Client Fees: Verified -----LANGUAGES----- Principal Applicant English- IEL TS Met
Threshold & Verified Spouse English-IELTS Verified -----EDUCATION----- Primary Applicant ECA report Verified
on issuing agency website; foreign credential confirmed on ECA site ECA Canadian Equivalency Summary
reported by issuing agency as Bachelor's degree (four years) Foreign credential provided Spouse Foreign
credential provided -----POLICE CERTIFICATE----- Primary Applicant India police certificate: Provided-NRT Qatar
police certificate: Provided-NRT R10 OK Recommendation: Pass Criminality Spouse Qatar police certificate:
Provided-NRT R10 OK Recommendation: Review Required-Stat Questions India PC Provided Thailand PC
Provided -----AGE----- Applicant's age reviewed and No Change from ITA to e-APR
Note 4 is your R10 or the completeness check note.
Note 1 is your eligibility note and has review required.
I had an old post on RR, re-posting it here.
Understanding “Review Required”
A lot of applicants see “review required” in their GCMS notes for eligibility. There are many theories floating around with regard to what “review required” means and if it is alarming.
Before I venture into explaining the significance, it is important to understand that each application goes through the following stages as per the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act and the regulations (Canadian Immigration Law):
R10 – Completeness Check
Criminality
Medicals
A11.2 – eligibility
Security
Out of the above, the most important stage is eligibility. This is also the most time-consuming stage because your documents have to be verified, evaluated and assessed to ascertain that you meet the eligibility criteria for the program you have applied (FSW / CEC / FTW). To stream line this process and make it easier for an immigration officer (decision making authority), all applications are first evaluated by case analysts or program assistants. They review the documents and summarize it in the GCMS. If they have any concerns with any document or want the immigration officer to carefully look into a specific document, they will flag it as “review required.” It is the content of the note that is important here. If the review required is for a specific document, while the summary of the note says that an applicant has met the eligibility, or “ready to finalize” it simply means that while the applicant has met the eligibility criteria, but the specific document needs a careful examination form the officer before promoting (eligibility pass) by the officer.
However, if there are concerns, there will be a review required for the eligibility, and there will be no text to the effect “ready to finalize” or pass. The note will specifically state job duties do not match, or the employment cannot be verified, or the number of years of work experience claimed cannot be verified. This is where an application can land in muddy waters. But the final decision rests on the immigration officer. He may override the decision of the analyst / assistant or go with the analysis of the analyst / assistant.
Even in cases where the analyst / assistant is of the opinion that the applicant has met the eligibility, and there is no “review required,” the officer can replace it with his own opinion. Though rare, but it does happen. This is why the eligibility is only passed when an officer conclusively marks the eligibility as passed.
Finally, there is “review required” for PoF. This is the most common in many applications. This is because, the financial and banking practices of each country are different. Eg. Fixed deposits are know as Certificate of Deposit (CD) in the US. Similarly, treasury bonds, mutual funds, stocks, and many other investment vehicles are there. If your PoF anything other than a bank deposit, it is more likely that it will be marked as “review required.” Also, IRCC does not go by day to day fluctuations in FOREX. Instead, the Canadian federal government issued a quarterly conversion rate for all FOREX vis-a-via CAD. If your PoF is in a foreign currency, then you may have “review required” for the officer to make a determination.
Just because you have “review required” does not mean that you hit the panic mode. Instead, read the context in which it is there. If there is a concern regarding a document, you can send a replacement document via CSE. The most common reasons for RR are:
1. Work reference letter without job duties
2. Work reference letters missing all the details requested by IRCC
3. If you submitted a letter from a colleague because you were unable to get one from your employer, but did not have a LoE on file, this too will lead to RR.
4. Not sufficient work experience in the primary NOC.
5. Inability to verify your employment as your employer details are missing.
There are just some of the scenarios.
