Hey folks,
I just received a "Procedural Fairness Letter" regarding the visa officer questioning my claimed work experience.
I applied with two years work experience under NOC 6311-Food Service Supervisors. I received a PGWP and started this job In late July 2014, after graduating in May 2014 with a BA in Sociology from a Canadian University.
The visa officer issues "serious concern" regarding how I managed to get a supervisor position, without what he calls "significant experience in a professional kitchen". And wants whatever prove and explanation I can provide if this claim is valid and why/how I've been hired.
My employer hired me as a supervisor, due to my communication skills, background in market research and well, two years of fast word employment. I received a manager position just a month ago, so while not relevant to the application, it shows my employer is at the very least happy with my work.
My previous manager, who left the business a month ago, offered to write a letter of explanation on why he thought I was qualified and further elaborating on my job description, etc.
I can get something similar from the owner and current general manager, on top of my initial contract, letter of recommendation, etc. I m going to add an LoE explaining that the only reason I kept this job for so long was due to this position, even though I could've worked at other places for higher compensation.
Do you people think this is sufficient material to satisfy the V.O.? I appreciate any sort of input.
I just received a "Procedural Fairness Letter" regarding the visa officer questioning my claimed work experience.
I applied with two years work experience under NOC 6311-Food Service Supervisors. I received a PGWP and started this job In late July 2014, after graduating in May 2014 with a BA in Sociology from a Canadian University.
The visa officer issues "serious concern" regarding how I managed to get a supervisor position, without what he calls "significant experience in a professional kitchen". And wants whatever prove and explanation I can provide if this claim is valid and why/how I've been hired.
My employer hired me as a supervisor, due to my communication skills, background in market research and well, two years of fast word employment. I received a manager position just a month ago, so while not relevant to the application, it shows my employer is at the very least happy with my work.
My previous manager, who left the business a month ago, offered to write a letter of explanation on why he thought I was qualified and further elaborating on my job description, etc.
I can get something similar from the owner and current general manager, on top of my initial contract, letter of recommendation, etc. I m going to add an LoE explaining that the only reason I kept this job for so long was due to this position, even though I could've worked at other places for higher compensation.
Do you people think this is sufficient material to satisfy the V.O.? I appreciate any sort of input.