Thank you >>>>>>>>> Legalfalcon <<<<<<<<<<<

[Jatt2canada]

@legalfalcon thank you for your prompt response. This is definitely a relief for me, since the morning i was being told by people that my application will be rejected by the visa officer.

 

[legalfalcon]

@legalfalcon thank you for your prompt response. This is definitely a relief for me, since the morning i was being told by people that my application will be rejected by the visa officer.

As long as all documents are uploaded, irrespective of even being uploaded in the wrong window, you are fine.

The requirement is to submit a completed application, which you have. Many applicants submit their application in funny ways with way too many documents, LOE for every document etc. And it does not matter.

 

[Formah]

@legalfalcon please what is the meaning of "RROC processing" on gcms? It is usually on officer's comment.

 

[lakshgosain]

Hello @legalfalcon hope you are well
I have a question regarding GCMS notes. Under Activity: 5, it says 11.2 EE MI Review Required
Activity: 1 says Selection-EE Econ Passed

On page 2 of my notes under assessments, Eligibility says Passed.
Can you please help me and explain if its been finally passed or still under review?

thank you,
Laksh

 

[legalfalcon]

@legalfalcon please what is the meaning of "RROC processing" on gcms? It is usually on officer's comment.

Rapid Response Operations Centre (RROC), is tasked with processing applications with certain NOC that are deemed essential for Canada. It will have to be seen the context in which this comment was made.

 

[legalfalcon]

Hello @legalfalcon hope you are well
I have a question regarding GCMS notes. Under Activity: 5, it says 11.2 EE MI Review Required
Activity: 1 says Selection-EE Econ Passed

On page 2 of my notes under assessments, Eligibility says Passed.
Can you please help me and explain if its been finally passed or still under review?

thank you,
Laksh

See the notes in the last 2-5 pages. You can compare it with my model detailed post available at #2,521

 

[riya2018]

@legalfalcon please look my GCMS notes
https://ibb.co/Yf03ZFk and provide me feedback

 

[lakshgosain]

See the notes in the last 2-5 pages. You can compare it with my model detailed post available at #2,521

Thank you @legalfalcon for the help! Appreciate it!

 

[Psyoptica]

@legalfalcon please look my GCMS notes
https://ibb.co/Yf03ZFk and provide me feedback

You seem to have a review required for POF. Your bank statement reflects $1819. The total settlement funds required for a family of 3 is $19390.

 

[riya2018]

You seem to have a review required for POF. Your bank statement reflects $1819. The total settlement funds required for a family of 3 is $19390.

But my bank letter clearly states 22k canadian dollar available for use. I had more than 20 k canadian dollar in fixed deposite and rest were in saving account. I think they only calculate according to bank statement. But i had provided bank letter stating all fixed and saving account. What should i do?

 

[legalfalcon]

@legalfalcon please look my GCMS notes
https://ibb.co/Yf03ZFk and provide me feedback

Is your PoF in a foreign currency?

 

[riya2018]

Is your PoF in a foreign currency?

No it is converted in canadian dollar.please look my link https://ibb.co/6mS44xd

 

[legalfalcon]

No it is converted in canadian dollar.please look my link https://ibb.co/6mS44xd

IRCC does not go by the bank conversion. It uses the quarterly rates as published by Bank of Canada. However, as long as you are over the minimum required PoF, you need not worry. Also, RR just indicates the the officer is asked to look into the specific document before making a decision, not that it is an issue. You can send a revised PoF in your own currency, without the bank converting it.

Apart from the PoF, everything looks good and there are no issues.

 

[riya2018]

IRCC does not go by the bank conversion. It uses the quarterly rates as published by Bank of Canada. However, as long as you are over the minimum required PoF, you need not worry. Also, RR just indicates the the officer is asked to look into the specific document before making a decision, not that it is an issue. You can send a revised PoF in your own currency, without the bank converting it.

Apart from the PoF, everything looks good and there are no issues.

Thank you very much.

 

[canpraspirant]

Hi @legalfalcon , I would like to ask something related to security screening. I have received my gcms notes where security is blanked out with s.15(1) on the top right, security under admissibilities is also blanked out for me and my spouse, just our name, family name, uci and type (security) is mentioned, under activity section, activity 1 is blanked out with just name and uci mentioned only rest details are blanked out and activity 2 has sub activity type of security and new value is blanked out.

Also after getting my eligibility passed, I received an ADR where they asked for the reason for my travel and how i financed them (I have extensive travel history).

Thanks in advance