I would not be surprised if SOME of those being scheduled soon for the virtual oath were not previously scheduled for an oath ceremony that got cancelled. At least IRCC has indicated it is also proceeding, in some instances, with expedited processing when there is at least a compelling reason.
That noted, however, so far it appears that those being scheduled for the virtual oath are mostly, if not nearly all, individuals who were previously scheduled for an oath ceremony that was cancelled.
Where does the
@Nocelox report fit into this?
@Nocelox only reports a Decision Made and not being scheduled for a previously cancelled oath ceremony, but then having been scheduled for a virtual oath a few days ago. My GUESS, and sure it is just a guess, but it is what fits into what we know, is that
@Nocelox was probably actually granted citizenship before the Covid-19 shutdown just before the Covid-19 shutdown and thus no notice to attend an oath ceremony went out before oath ceremonies were cancelled across the board. That is, my GUESS is that
@Nocelox getting to participate in a virtual oath ceremony is quite likely consistent with, so far, but for unusual expedited cases, the scheduling of virtual oaths for those who were already granted citizenship.
What we still do not know is how IRCC is selecting which "candidates" (those who have already been granted citizenship but are not citizens until they participate in taking the oath) it is scheduling to take the virtual oath. It is not likely that IRCC will share much information about how this decision-making is done. That does not mean it is a lottery, random, haphazard, or capricious. It just means that whatever the decision-making protocol is, IRCC is not publishing information about it. Which makes sense. It is clearly a transitory process pending formulation and implementation of more long-term procedures. It may even be changing some week-to-week.