September 2018 AOR - join here
- Thread starter andy108
- Start date
Hi
so after a whole year of waiting IRCC are trolling me
on 5th sep 2019 found an email asking me to open my cic account as there is a message
I was like yeaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay it's moving finally yeaaaaaaay, they are definetly gonna ask me for remeds or maybe any ADR !
Guess what the meassge reads :
https://ibb.co/5rVvrGV
after a whole year hey just sent this shit, the shit I have been hearing each time I call, Raise CSE, or Email CPC-Ottawa !!!
I mean are they serious!!!!
am infuriated, mad, sad & disappinted !!!
so after a whole year of waiting IRCC are trolling me
on 5th sep 2019 found an email asking me to open my cic account as there is a message
I was like yeaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay it's moving finally yeaaaaaaay, they are definetly gonna ask me for remeds or maybe any ADR !
Guess what the meassge reads :
https://ibb.co/5rVvrGV
after a whole year hey just sent this shit, the shit I have been hearing each time I call, Raise CSE, or Email CPC-Ottawa !!!
I mean are they serious!!!!
am infuriated, mad, sad & disappinted !!!
No ghost updates, Only ghost update was for remed expiry...
And I have to wait till Oct before i can email goodale again as u know goodale only entertains a particular applicant once in 3 months.
NEED HELP Interpreting GCMS Notes
From our GCMS notes
A11.2: REVIEW REQUIRED
R75 FSW MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS- Met
R76: SELECTION CRITERIA - FSW POINTS: REVIEW REQUIRED
R76: SELECTION CRITERIA - FUNDS: REVIEW REQUIRED
As noted in one of my earlier posts, the proof of funds has the REVIEW REQUIRED status. However, we are confused about the "FSW POINTS: REVIEW REQUIRED". Does anyone know what this means?
The case analyst hasn't written 'RR' in any other section
The following lines in the note say
FSW points total: 74
Ready to finalize RPFP: Complete
...
...
WORK EXPERIENCE:Lock-in-Date:2018-10-20.
Primary Occupation:NOC 2173 Software Engineers
EDUCATION CREDENTIAL PROVIDED:Master's Degree
xxxx-xx-xx to xxx-xx-xx-Senior Software Engineer (NOC 2173)-at XXXXXX-eDOC#xxxxxxxxx-Letter Dated 2018-10-05 appears to confirm employment in the declared occupation throughout the specified period and provides a job description which is consistent with the lead statement and main duties as set in the declared NOC category - Letter confirms salary of USD X/year - Letter confirms full/time employment;
FSW Work :9 years and 5 months. CRS Foreign Work: 9 years and 5 months.FSW Work:1 year CRS Foreign Work:3 + years
WORK EXPERIENCE: 6 +years ,15 FSW points
I didn't see any concerns raised by the analyst apart from proof of funds. Both education and work experience sections seem fine.
As per the 'EE Eligibility' section earlier in the notes, the points add up to 79 (Language: 24, Education: 23, Work Experience: 15, Age: 12, Adaptability: 5).
From our GCMS notes
A11.2: REVIEW REQUIRED
R75 FSW MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS- Met
R76: SELECTION CRITERIA - FSW POINTS: REVIEW REQUIRED
R76: SELECTION CRITERIA - FUNDS: REVIEW REQUIRED
As noted in one of my earlier posts, the proof of funds has the REVIEW REQUIRED status. However, we are confused about the "FSW POINTS: REVIEW REQUIRED". Does anyone know what this means?
The case analyst hasn't written 'RR' in any other section
The following lines in the note say
FSW points total: 74
Ready to finalize RPFP: Complete
...
...
WORK EXPERIENCE:Lock-in-Date:2018-10-20.
Primary Occupation:NOC 2173 Software Engineers
EDUCATION CREDENTIAL PROVIDED:Master's Degree
xxxx-xx-xx to xxx-xx-xx-Senior Software Engineer (NOC 2173)-at XXXXXX-eDOC#xxxxxxxxx-Letter Dated 2018-10-05 appears to confirm employment in the declared occupation throughout the specified period and provides a job description which is consistent with the lead statement and main duties as set in the declared NOC category - Letter confirms salary of USD X/year - Letter confirms full/time employment;
FSW Work :9 years and 5 months. CRS Foreign Work: 9 years and 5 months.FSW Work:1 year CRS Foreign Work:3 + years
WORK EXPERIENCE: 6 +years ,15 FSW points
I didn't see any concerns raised by the analyst apart from proof of funds. Both education and work experience sections seem fine.
As per the 'EE Eligibility' section earlier in the notes, the points add up to 79 (Language: 24, Education: 23, Work Experience: 15, Age: 12, Adaptability: 5).
i do not see anything of concern other than rr on pof '- hope you sent in additional bank statements and docs to support rr..
For the points - case analyst would have put it on review just for an officer to look into it confirm again because the analyst was not sure - if you are confident about points from your end - you dont have to worry abt it ..
As mentioned before - some case analysts could be new and inexperienced hence creating so many rr's ..
Hang in there mate - we are all going to see our ppr in less than 1 - 2 Months max
Then all that can be done now is wait bro - for both the notes ..
Thank you for your response!Y I looked at the notes and didn't see RR on any thing other than POF. But the R76 SELECTION CRITERIA RR confused me.So wanted someone else's perspective.Thanks!
I think the rest of us remaining in sept aor can just say goodbye to canada because clearly nothing is happening.. no one is even posting ppr updates these days...1 year has passed and now even theres a new sept thread which is for 2019 LOL such BS!!
Just hit the 1 year processing time.
AOR September 8th, 2019.
CEC Inland
Spoke to an agent this morning, eligibility, criminality, and additional docs have been reviewed and passed. Just Security left.
Any idea how long Security takes?
Cheers,
AOR September 8th, 2019.
CEC Inland
Spoke to an agent this morning, eligibility, criminality, and additional docs have been reviewed and passed. Just Security left.
Any idea how long Security takes?
Cheers,