THANK YOU for this personal account of your journey. AND CONGRATULATIONS for becoming a Canadian citizen.My journey started when I got my PR as a refugee back in 2009 and shortly after I applied for a new passport from my country of citizenship since my seized passport had expired. Given that someone important in my family had terminal illness I wanted to go back to visit but I actually still had genuine fears for my life given the political situation and the reason why I claimed (threat from state actors). I had planned to sneak into the country through a third country but that option was ruled out because due to the remoteness of the border entry, I felt that if caught by state actors, they would be at liberty to do anything to me in the shadows as opposed to the at the bright lights of an international airport. After much thought, I felt a lot of anger because, despite being a “protected person” in Canada I felt that my oppressors still had a virtual stranglehold on me by virtue of my fear to travel there. I viewed this as a virtual prison that effectively alienated me from my family - not being able to visit with my dying family member. My anger and the "activist" in me led me to deciding to "take them head on" - take a risk to visit my loved one - to go as normal through the airport.
I hope others read your account and appreciate its nuances.
Some Observations:
Perhaps the most important observation is the least secure one: your story tends to reaffirm the view that the Canadian government is NOT approaching this punitively. That NOT all PR-refugees who obtain a home country passport and travel to the home country will have cessation proceedings brought against them. Unfortunately, as you so eloquently illustrated, under the current law there is no guarantee of a "reasonable, balanced approach that is humane while upholding immigration system integrity," so those who have faced similar dilemmas, which can arise for a variety of reasons, and made similar decisions, remain at risk and indeed should proceed rather cautiously going forward.
I also applaud your patience. I am a big advocate of WAITING to apply for citizenship in SOME personal situations, and your patience in this regard is a strong testament to the prudence of doing this. The reasons why it would be prudent to wait longer to apply for citizenship vary widely. Many prospective citizenship applicants would be wise to be less focused on the date they become *eligible,* and more focused on WHEN is the RIGHT TIME for THEM, for them PERSONALLY, to make a citizenship application. (I waited well over two years past the date I first became eligible, and I am confident that was indeed a good decision.)
Some further observations about your journey in particular:
It warrants noting that when you applied for a home country passport in 2009, that could have NO EFFECT on your PR status in Canada. There was NO reason, at that time, to apprehend anything wrong about obtaining a new passport from your home country.
It appears your trip to the home country was also in 2009 or soon thereafter. In any event, any trip to your home country BEFORE December 2012 would NOT have any legal impact on your PR status. Yes, of course, there were some RISKS, the dangers, relative to the situation fled, but in terms of your PR status, there was NOTHING prohibiting a trip to the home country, NO legal consequences for traveling to the home country. NO reason to apprehend any problems other than those directly about being in your home country (as you described).
THEN, in December 2012 the Harper government CHANGED the law. And that change not only imposed severe consequences for refugee-PRs who obtained a home country passport after it took effect, in December 2012, it imposed potentially catastrophic consequences for those who had done so BEFORE the change in law. Likewise regarding travel to the home country. Even though there was NO legal prohibition or Canadian consequences for travel to the home country at the time of the travel, AFTER December 2012 any such travel could become grounds for cessation . . . and indeed, one of the early cases involved a PR who had traveled to the home country nearly a DECADE earlier, long, long before there was even a hint Canada might change the law.
If you became aware of the cessation problem in 2014, that was well BEFORE I did. Perhaps a good thing you were aware of it. As well as things went with your citizenship application in 2018, an application when Chris Alexander was the Minister of CIC, back in 2014 or 2015, might NOT have gone so well. While the law itself did not change after the end of the Harper government, there are indications the subsequent government has been significantly less aggressive in its enforcement.
Note that I started this topic in August 2015. I was stunned, at the time, that there was so little known about this huge change in the law that had taken place two and a half years earlier, and how it was having a draconian impact on PR-refugees, many of whom were NOT aware that cessation could apply to a Canadian PR. And back then it seemed more than a few lawyers were not very much familiar with the Harper change in law. My impression is that in the meantime many more lawyers have become educated about this issue.
Finally I wholeheartedly agree with your caution to others who may face this issue, including in particular that they consider seeking professional legal advice before proceeding with a citizenship application if there are any cessation grounds possibly applicable in their cases.
Again, thank you. Thorough reporting of this sort is very much appreciated.